ORCHIDEE-PEAT (revision 4596), a model for northern peatland CO<sub>2</sub>, water and energy fluxes on daily to annual scales

Abstract

Abstract. Peatlands store substantial amount of carbon, are vulnerable to climate change. To predict the fate of carbon stored in peatlands, the complex interactions between water, peat and vegetations need more attention. This study describes a modified version of the ORCHIDEE land surface model for simulating the hydrology, surface energy and CO2 fluxes of peatlands on daily to annual time scales. The model, referred to as ORCHIDEE-PEAT, includes a separate soil tile in each 0.5° grid-cell, defined from a global peatland map and identified with peat-specific soil hydraulic properties. Runoff from non-peat vegetation with a grid-cell containing a fraction of peat is routed to this peat soil tile, which maintains shallow water tables. The water table position separates oxic from anoxic decomposition. The model is evaluated against eddy-covariance (EC) observations from 30 northern peatland sites, with the maximum rate of carboxylation (Vcmax) being optimized at each site to match the peak of growing season gross primary productivity (GPP), derived from direct EC measurements. Regarding short-term variations from day to day, the model performance was good for the variations in GPP (r2 = 0.76, Nash-Sutcliff modeling efficiency, MEF = 0.76), with lesser accuracy for latent heat fluxes (LE, r2 = 0.42, MEF = 0.14) and Net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE, r2 = 0.38, MEF = 0.26). Seasonal variations in GPP, NEE and energy fluxes on monthly scales showed moderate to high r2 values ranging from 0.57 to 0.86. For spatial across-sites gradients of annual mean GPP, NEE and LE, r2 of 0.93, 0.27, and 0.71, respectively, were achieved. The water table variations are not well predicted (r2 < 0.1), likely due to the uncertain water input to the peat from surrounding areas. However, when using the observed water table in the carbon module to define the fraction of oxic and anoxic decomposition instead of the modeled water table, ORCHIDEE-PEAT shows a small improvement in reproducing NEE. Moreover, we found a significant relationship between optimized Vcmax and the latitude (temperature), which can better reflect the spatial gradients of annual NEE than using an average Vcmax value. In a future version of ORCHIDEE-PEAT, the influences of water table on photosynthesis and depth-dependent influences of soil temperature on respiration may be included.

High‐resolution peat volume change in a northern peatland: Spatial variability, main drivers, and impact on ecohydrology

“…It therefore seems unlikely that spatial variability in ΔGWT A was caused by spatially variable evapotranspiration rates. Spatial variability in ΔGWT A thus mainly resulted from lateral redistribution of groundwater, corroborating peatland model studies stressing the need to account for lateral flow Qiu et al, 2018).…”

“…Spatial coverage of rain events is larger than square kilometres in flat areas such as peatlands (Ciach & Krajewski, 2006;Rakovec, Hazenberg, Torfs, Weerts, & Uijlenhoet, 2012) and can thus be assumed uniform along the transect. Spatial variability in ΔGWT A thus mainly resulted from lateral redistribution of groundwater, corroborating peatland model studies stressing the need to account for lateral flow Qiu et al, 2018). It therefore seems unlikely that spatial variability in ΔGWT A was caused by spatially variable evapotranspiration rates.…”

The role of northern peatlands in the global carbon cycle for the 21st century

“…Based on the process-based land surface model ORCHIDEE-MICT (Guimberteau et al, 2018), the branch ORCHIDEE-PEAT was developed explicitly to represent peatland-specific hydrological, carbon and area dynamics. ORCHIDEE-PEAT has been tested at both local and regional levels, and a detailed description was provided by Qiu et al (2018Qiu et al ( , 2019. Here, we give only a brief outline of the model.…”

“…Thus, although the total change in soil carbon is similar between SimYY and SimYN, its attribution to peat versus non-peat is very different. (Qiu et al, 2018) with simulated values extracted from grid cells corresponding to these sites. The model shows good performance in capturing observed monthly mean NEE across these peatland sites (Supporting Information Figure S5).…”

A Novel Approach for High-Frequency in-situ Quantification of Methane Oxidation in Peatlands

“…Furthermore, current studies do not estimate the contribution of CO 2 resulting from CH 4 oxidation to total ecosystem respiration (ER, abbreviations are listed in Table 1), and thus our understanding of the importance of this process in relation to the other CO 2 component fluxes is limited. Most peatland CO 2 models assume that all heterotrophic respiration (R h ) comes from soil organic matter (SOM) mineralization [5][6][7][8] while ignoring the contributions from CH 4 oxidation. Meanwhile, those models that estimate in-situ CH 4 oxidation lack data for validation [9].…”