2019
DOI: 10.31263/voebm.v72i2.2811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ORCID in the Open Science scenario: opportunities for academic libraries

Abstract: The persistent identification of authors and contributors plays a decisive role within the Open Science landscape. The increasing number of published research products and new open publishing models and infrastructures requires author identification which goes beyond fields or infrastructures and guarantees interoperability. ORCID iD is presented as a persistent identifier for researchers in this context. As information managers and organisers, many academic libraries have taken the lead in offering ORCID-rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having an ORCID would also allow authors to be correctly matched to their published articles, 3 an important factor when considering authors who may have identical names, especially those that are culturally popular, for example, John Smith, and thus easy to confuse. The next phase of the ‘globalization’ of author identity archival, tracking and indexing involved implementing ORCID at the journal and publisher levels, and to fortify the base of adherents, it was promoted as an open science tool 4 . To that end, ORCID is touted as a trustworthy ‘integrity’ tool because it supposedly ensures the veracity of the author's identity, offering a reliable background to their publishing portfolios 5 …”
Section: Orcid For Author Disambiguation Bibliometrics and Indexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having an ORCID would also allow authors to be correctly matched to their published articles, 3 an important factor when considering authors who may have identical names, especially those that are culturally popular, for example, John Smith, and thus easy to confuse. The next phase of the ‘globalization’ of author identity archival, tracking and indexing involved implementing ORCID at the journal and publisher levels, and to fortify the base of adherents, it was promoted as an open science tool 4 . To that end, ORCID is touted as a trustworthy ‘integrity’ tool because it supposedly ensures the veracity of the author's identity, offering a reliable background to their publishing portfolios 5 …”
Section: Orcid For Author Disambiguation Bibliometrics and Indexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it was promoted as an open science tool. 4 To that end, ORCID is touted as a trustworthy 'integrity' tool because it supposedly ensures the veracity of the author's identity, offering a reliable background to their publishing portfolios. 5 Nowadays, many journals employ manuscript submission systems (MSSs) (Two commonly used OSSs are Clarivate's ScholarOne [https://clarivate.com/products/scientific-and-academic-research/ research-publishing-solutions/scholarone/] and Aries Systems Corporation's Editorial Manager [https://www.ariessys.com/about/privacy-policy/]) that allow authors to securely submit their papers, a process that involves registering their names and, depending on the MSS and journal, their ORCID.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ORCID emerged as a tool not only for author identification [4], but as an integral part of academic publishing ecosystem's integrity [5]. ORCID was even touted as a component of the open science movement by claims that it fortified trust [6]. There are currently over 15.7 million live ORCID accounts [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%