2022
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202111392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Order–Disorder Transitions in a Polar Vortex Lattice

Abstract: Order–disorder transitions are widely explored in various vortex structures in condensed matter physics, that is, in the type‐II superconductors and Bose–Einstein condensates. In this study, the ordering of the polar vortex phase in [Pb(Zr0.4Ti0.6)O3]n/(SrTiO3)n (PZT/STO) superlattices is investigated through phase‐field simulations. With a large tensile substrate strain, an antiorder vortex state (where the rotation direction of the vortex arrays in the neighboring ferroelectric layers are flipped) is discove… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of the SrTiO 3 spacer layer required to decouple the two adjoining ferroelectric layers is set by how the electric and elastic fields depend upon the polarization value of each ferroelectric layer, the magnitude of the ferroelectric proximity induced dipole–dipole interaction strength, [ 40 ] and the polarization due to substrate‐induced epitaxial strain. [ 41 ] This is consistent with what has been previously observed in the order‐disorder transition in superlattices exhibiting polar vortices [ 41 ] and in ferroelectric proximity effects in ferroelectric bilayers. [ 40 ] In essence, the electric and elastic fields in the SrTiO 3 layer decay with increasing distance, a distance that scales with the polarization of the adjoining ferroelectric layers and with the strain.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The thickness of the SrTiO 3 spacer layer required to decouple the two adjoining ferroelectric layers is set by how the electric and elastic fields depend upon the polarization value of each ferroelectric layer, the magnitude of the ferroelectric proximity induced dipole–dipole interaction strength, [ 40 ] and the polarization due to substrate‐induced epitaxial strain. [ 41 ] This is consistent with what has been previously observed in the order‐disorder transition in superlattices exhibiting polar vortices [ 41 ] and in ferroelectric proximity effects in ferroelectric bilayers. [ 40 ] In essence, the electric and elastic fields in the SrTiO 3 layer decay with increasing distance, a distance that scales with the polarization of the adjoining ferroelectric layers and with the strain.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These results help to explain previous observations in polar vortices 8,19,20 and polar skyrmions, 21,22 where the topological textures become more coherent with an increasing number of superlattice repetitions. Previously observed in polar sky- rmions, for example, there is a scaling of the dielectric response with the number of superlattice units.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…[88] Besides the PTO/STO system, the polar vortex has also been discovered in other ferroelectric materials systems, including BiFeO 3 (BFO)-based superlattices, [154,155] BFO thin films, [132,156] BTO nanoparticles, [157] PVDF-based thin films, [158] and molecular ferroelectrics. [159] Moreover, polar antivortex, a structure with the opposite winding number as a polar vortex, has been discovered in the PTO/STO superlattice, [160,161] PZT/ STO superlattice, [162] as well as in the BFO thin films. [163,164] By carefully engineering of the film thicknesses, polar antivortex was successfully created and observed at atomic-scale within dielectric STO layer in PTO/STO superlattices (Figure 3d).…”
Section: Topological Polar Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%