2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02457-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Order enables efficient electron-hole separation at an organic heterojunction with a small energy loss

Abstract: Donor–acceptor organic solar cells often show low open-circuit voltages (V OC) relative to their optical energy gap (E g) that limit power conversion efficiencies to ~12%. This energy loss is partly attributed to the offset between E g and that of intermolecular charge transfer (CT) states at the donor–acceptor interface. Here we study charge generation occurring in PIPCP:PC61BM, a system with a very low driving energy for initial charge separation (E g−E CT ~ 50 meV) and a high internal quantum efficiency (η … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
143
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
143
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These interfaces usually have a relative large interfacial energy offset such that the direct charge generation from hot CT excitons is an isoenergetic process. Interestingly, recent works on non‐fullerene acceptors (NFAs) show that CT excitons can convert efficiently into free carriers despite the much smaller energy offset at the donor–acceptor interface 30–33. The small energy offset implies that CS is likely to be an energy uphill process because the singlet exciton has an energy lower than that of the free electron–hole pair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interfaces usually have a relative large interfacial energy offset such that the direct charge generation from hot CT excitons is an isoenergetic process. Interestingly, recent works on non‐fullerene acceptors (NFAs) show that CT excitons can convert efficiently into free carriers despite the much smaller energy offset at the donor–acceptor interface 30–33. The small energy offset implies that CS is likely to be an energy uphill process because the singlet exciton has an energy lower than that of the free electron–hole pair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the previously reported empirical lower limit of a 0.3 eV driving force required for efficient CT in typical polymer:fullerene blends 12,13 . Understanding the impact of driving force on the CT dynamics is particularly important in organic solar cells, since the CT state energy also determines the open circuit voltage (V OC ), so that a small driving force is desirable, but might lead to a tradeoff in current generation if the recombination of excitons competes with their slow dissociation [13][14][15][16][17] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21,22] While there are systems in which almost perfect CP separation takes place, [23] large losses by recombination can be observed in others. [21,22] While there are systems in which almost perfect CP separation takes place, [23] large losses by recombination can be observed in others.…”
Section: Wwwadvtheorysimulcommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has proven to be particularly useful to model exciton and charge behavior in spatially and energetically disordered OPVs. [21,22] Typical values for the energetic disorder range from 70 meV in blends formed from poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) blend, down to 30 meV. OSC device models have emerged to simulate current-voltage characteristics, [37,38] the effect of blend morphology, [39,40] charge mobility extractions, [41,42] as well as CP separation, [30,[43][44][45][46][47][48] and its competing process, geminate recombination.…”
Section: Wwwadvtheorysimulcommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation