1994
DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90022-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Order relationships for boundary conditions effect in heterogeneous bodies smaller than the representative volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
139
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
139
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Xia et al [234] reported that the homogeneous boundary conditions, when applied on periodic microstructures, "are not only overconstrained, but may also violate the boundary traction periodicity conditions" under loading types with shear components. Hazanov and Huet [235], Hazanov and Amieur [236], and Pahr and Zysset [237] proposed uniform mixedtype boundary conditions that consider applying constant traction boundary conditions on some parts of the boundary and linear displacement boundary conditions to the other parts such that the apparent elasticity tensor for this boundary condition lies between the apparent tensors obtained with homogeneous boundary conditions. Mesarovic and Padbidri [238] argued that there is no reason to assume that an RVE with random microstructure behaves as a periodic unit cell and suggested the use of minimal kinematic boundary conditions.…”
Section: Computational Homogenizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xia et al [234] reported that the homogeneous boundary conditions, when applied on periodic microstructures, "are not only overconstrained, but may also violate the boundary traction periodicity conditions" under loading types with shear components. Hazanov and Huet [235], Hazanov and Amieur [236], and Pahr and Zysset [237] proposed uniform mixedtype boundary conditions that consider applying constant traction boundary conditions on some parts of the boundary and linear displacement boundary conditions to the other parts such that the apparent elasticity tensor for this boundary condition lies between the apparent tensors obtained with homogeneous boundary conditions. Mesarovic and Padbidri [238] argued that there is no reason to assume that an RVE with random microstructure behaves as a periodic unit cell and suggested the use of minimal kinematic boundary conditions.…”
Section: Computational Homogenizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously stated, if the meso-scale volume-element ω on which the averaging is performed is large enough, the so-called RVE is statistically representative and a unique material tensor C eff M can be obtained for these different 1 Although not true for general MBCs, particular MBCs such as the orthogonal uniform ones can be defined in a particular way as to satisfy the Hill-Mandel condition (17), see the discussion in [42]. Assuming a rectangular parallelepiped RVE, on every face we constrain along one direction -says x-the displacements to um x = z i=x ε Mxi x i , so that u mx = 0, and along the two other directions tm j = z k=x σ Mjk nm k , j = y, z.…”
Section: Generalities On Representative and Statistical Volume Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we can define the corresponding static and kinematic statistical apparent elasticity matrices, denoted respectively by [L app σ ] and [L app ]. Using the same methodology as in Section 2.1.3 (that is, introducing a partitioning of Ω), it can be shown that the following inequality holds for any given realization of the random media [10]: The boundedness property (18) holds for apparent tensors defined with respect to very particular kinds of boundary conditions (namely, KUBC and SUBC) which may not be encountered in practical applications or may be tricky to reproduce experimentally (as pointed out in [8] …”
Section: Inequalities Between Apparent Tensors At Various Mesoscalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the above mechanical definitions do not coincide with the energetic ones, unless the retained boundary conditions satisfy the Hill condition (see [8] for a discussion). A particular family of MBC satisfying Eq.…”
Section: Inequalities Between Apparent Tensors At Various Mesoscalesmentioning
confidence: 99%