2014
DOI: 10.1504/ijgei.2014.067671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordered weight averaging multicriteria procedure and cost-effectiveness analysis for short rotation forestry in the Basilicata region, Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This data is in agreement with what is reported by Fiala (2012), where the mean price is estimated to D55-60/t untreated, for good quality wood chips. However, among benefit items the possible revenues generated in the form of white certificates that would lead to extra economic profits were not considered (Romano et al, 2013b;Cozzi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data is in agreement with what is reported by Fiala (2012), where the mean price is estimated to D55-60/t untreated, for good quality wood chips. However, among benefit items the possible revenues generated in the form of white certificates that would lead to extra economic profits were not considered (Romano et al, 2013b;Cozzi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of MCE techniques-GIS may be useful to solve conflicting situations in spatial contexts (Janssen and Rietveld 1990;Malczewski 2004) and constitutes an effective approach in the analysis of land use suitability/risk (hazard) (Yager 1988;Carver 1991;Eastman 1997;Malczewski 2004;Thill 1999;Romano and Cozzi 2006;Romano et al 2013;Cozzi et al 2014). This integration may be conceived as a process that combines and transforms spatial and nonspatial data (input) into a decision (output), defining a relation between input maps and the output map obtained from geographical data and decision preferences, handled according to specified decision rules (Malczewski 2004).…”
Section: Aggregation Of Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was based on consulting local stakeholders and on carrying out an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Saaty, 1977(Saaty, , 1980Kurttilaa et al 2000;Wickramasinghe, Takano, 2010;Gőrener et al, 2012). Widely used in the decision problems (Romano et al, 2013;Cozzi et al, 2014Cozzi et al, , 2015, the AHP method allows defining the priority/relevance order assigned by the stakeholders to the different factor (threats/opportunities and strengths/weaknesses) with respect to the aim of developing the local forest-wood sector (Fagarazzi et al, 2003;Rauch, 2007). Accordingly, it was possible to define the strengths/weaknesses factors and the threat/opportunities factors not as a simple list of numerous variables (size of the resources, availability of infrastructures, legal opportunities, etc.…”
Section: Swotmentioning
confidence: 99%