2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0217595919400049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordering Decision and Coordination of a Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns Under an Online-to-Offline Model

Abstract: We introduce reference dependence to describe the fairness utility functions of channel members and model a dual-channel supply chain (one manufacturer and one retailer) in three scenarios: only the manufacturer is concerned with fairness, only the retailer is concerned with fairness, and both parties are concerned with fairness. The ordering decisions and coordination of a dual-channel supply chain under the online-to-offline (O2O) business model are studied. Nash equilibrium solutions exist for the channel o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To better position our study in the extant literature, we compare the closely related literature with our study in Table 1 with respect to the following key features, i.e., onlineto-offline supply chain, pricing, coordination, corporate environmental responsibility, and lateral inventory transshipment. It is necessary to point out that, the key reference literatures in our study are [14] and [23]. Our study has essential difference from them, i.e., our study considers corporate environmental responsibility, and pays attention to the decision on the corporate environmental responsibility level.…”
Section: Supply Chain Operations With Lateral Inventory Transshipmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To better position our study in the extant literature, we compare the closely related literature with our study in Table 1 with respect to the following key features, i.e., onlineto-offline supply chain, pricing, coordination, corporate environmental responsibility, and lateral inventory transshipment. It is necessary to point out that, the key reference literatures in our study are [14] and [23]. Our study has essential difference from them, i.e., our study considers corporate environmental responsibility, and pays attention to the decision on the corporate environmental responsibility level.…”
Section: Supply Chain Operations With Lateral Inventory Transshipmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For studies on online-to-offline supply chain coordination, for examples, Yu et al [23] studied ordering decisions and coordination with fairness concerns in the dual-channel supply chain. They found that inventory transshipment strategy can realize coordination under O2O business model.…”
Section: Operations Management In Online-to-offline Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enterprise economic level and product greenness of decentralized scenario (DS and DM) and cost sharing contract scenario (DS-CP, DS-CM and DM-CP) are compared. The parameters in the model are assigned as follows (Yu et al, 2019):…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the green clothing supply chain, Adhikari and Bisi [8] explored the impact of fairness concerns on greening quality and profitability of the supply chain under the green cost sharing and revenue-sharing contract , and showed that fairness concerns would reduce the green level. Yu et al [9] investigated ordering strategies in a dual-channel supply chain context with three scenarios: manufacturer with fairness concerns, retailer with fairness concerns, and bidirectional fairness concerns, for a dual-channel supply chain context, and used an inventory parceling strategy to achieve dual-channel supply chain coordination. Zhang and Li [10]discussed the impact of manufacturer fairness concerns and whether retailers consider manufacturer fairness concerns on supply chain greenness in a green closed-loop supply chain, and supply chain coordination was achieved using revenue sharing contracts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%