2016
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordering patterns following the implementation of a healthier children's restaurant menu: A latent class analysis

Abstract: Objective: Identify ordering patterns following implementation of a healthier children's menu. Methods: A healthier children's menu was introduced in 2012 at a regional restaurant chain, featuring more meals meeting Kids LiveWell (KLW) nutrition standards, KLW side dishes bundled with meals, and the removal of French fries and soda. Latent class analysis was conducted on child meal orders placed after menu implementation (n 5 8,611). The average calorie content and proportion of orders meeting calorie recommen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, child meals were often identified on sales reports by the entrée name only; thus, we could not examine variations in meal composition. Unhealthy add-ons and substitutions (i.e., asking to remove vegetables from quesadilla) to a new healthy child meal can negate the impact of the new menu item [ 39 ]. Second, restaurants were reluctant to remove unhealthy child menu items, such as grilled cheese sandwiches and fried chicken tenders from their menus; workarounds such as those enacted by other researchers and practitioners may be warranted (e.g., continued encouragement to remove from printed menu but make available upon request; [ 20 , 26 , 40 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, child meals were often identified on sales reports by the entrée name only; thus, we could not examine variations in meal composition. Unhealthy add-ons and substitutions (i.e., asking to remove vegetables from quesadilla) to a new healthy child meal can negate the impact of the new menu item [ 39 ]. Second, restaurants were reluctant to remove unhealthy child menu items, such as grilled cheese sandwiches and fried chicken tenders from their menus; workarounds such as those enacted by other researchers and practitioners may be warranted (e.g., continued encouragement to remove from printed menu but make available upon request; [ 20 , 26 , 40 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restaurants could make menu changes by adding new healthy items and changing existing items to have a broader impact to improve the dietary quality of children’s restaurant meals [ 133 ]. Through the Kids LiveWell Program, the NRA should show leadership to incentivize members to reduce and standardize portions for à la carte components of children′s “bundled meals” to meet 100 percent of their own nutrient criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This repeated cross-sectional study follows previous research evaluating child meal orders after the implementation of a healthier children’s menu [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. We conducted a secondary analysis of adult menu order data from 13 outlets of the Silver Diner, a full-service restaurant chain located in the mid-Atlantic region of the US that serves >4 million customers annually.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restaurant introduced the new, healthier children’s menu in April 2012. Additional information about the restaurant and the children’s menu changes have been published elsewhere [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Briefly, this new menu included more entrées that met Kids LiveWell nutrition criteria [ 1 ], all meals automatically bundled with fruit and non-fried vegetable sides, and the removal of French Fries and soda.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation