1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3975(97)00009-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordinal recursive bounds for Higman's theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, upper bounds for (N d × Q, ≤) for some finite set Q, along with the product ordering, can be found in [42,Theorem 2.34], where the norm of a pair (x, q) from N d × Q is max 1≤i≤d x(i): Proof. Let us first recall the definition of the Cichoń hierarchy of functions for indices α < ε 0 [7]:…”
Section: Fast-growing Upper Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, upper bounds for (N d × Q, ≤) for some finite set Q, along with the product ordering, can be found in [42,Theorem 2.34], where the norm of a pair (x, q) from N d × Q is max 1≤i≤d x(i): Proof. Let us first recall the definition of the Cichoń hierarchy of functions for indices α < ε 0 [7]:…”
Section: Fast-growing Upper Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, they still enjoy decision procedures for several verification problems, prominently safety (through the coverability problem) and termination. They share these properties with the other extensions of Petri nets with 1. for the upper bound, a controlled bad sequence can be extracted from any run of the backward coverability algorithm, and in turn the length of this sequence can be bounded using a length function theorem for the wqo at hand (e.g., Cichoń and Tahhan Bittar 1998;Figueira et al 2011;Rosa-Velardo 2014, for the mentioned results);…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fast-forwarding a bit, we get for instance a function of exponential growth H ω 2 (x) = 2 x+1 (x + 1) − 1, and later a non-elementary function H ω 3 akin to a tower of exponentials, and a non primitive-recursive function H ω ω of Ackermannian growth. In the following, we will use the following property of Hardy functions [38,8], which can be checked by induction provided α + β is in Cantor normal form (and justifies the use of superscripts):…”
Section: Subrecursive Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the Cichoń functions, an easy induction on α shows that H α (x) = H α (x) + x for the hierarchy relative to H(x) def = x + 1. But the main interest of Cichoń functions is that they capture how many iterations are performed by Hardy functions [8]:…”
Section: Subrecursive Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%