1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf00250722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordinary differential equations of non-linear elasticity I: Foundations of the theories of non-linearly elastic rods and shells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
7

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
80
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This viewpoint is thus analogous to that of Antman [3], who, back in 1976, was the first to suggest that the metric tensor field of a deformed configuration in nonlinear threedimensional elasticity could be considered as the primary unknown on its own, instead of the position vector field as is customary. It was likewise, but more recently, recognized that the first and second fundamental form of a deformed middle surface in nonlinear shell theory could be considered as primary unknowns on their own, instead of the position vector field of the middle surface (for recent developments and references on such approaches see [14] and [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This viewpoint is thus analogous to that of Antman [3], who, back in 1976, was the first to suggest that the metric tensor field of a deformed configuration in nonlinear threedimensional elasticity could be considered as the primary unknown on its own, instead of the position vector field as is customary. It was likewise, but more recently, recognized that the first and second fundamental form of a deformed middle surface in nonlinear shell theory could be considered as primary unknowns on their own, instead of the position vector field of the middle surface (for recent developments and references on such approaches see [14] and [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In 1864, A. J. C. B. de Saint Venant showed that, if functions e ij = e ji ∈ C 3 (Ω) satisfy in a simply-connected open subset Ω of R 3 ad hoc compatibility relations that since then bear his name, then there exists a vector field (v i ) ∈ C 4 (Ω) such that e ij = 1 2 (∂ j v i + ∂ i v j ) in Ω. Thanks to Theorem 3.1, it can be shown that the same St Venant compatibility relations are also sufficient conditions in the sense of distributions, according to the following result (again due to Ciarlet and Ciarlet, Jr. 10 ):…”
Section: Idea Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous models of this sort in the literature, of course, such as [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [10], [11], and [13]. In this respect, our primary "point of departure" is to assume that "in line" or "in plane" displacements are of the same order as the square of the transverse and/or shearing displacements generally admitted into linear models of the same structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%