2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0939-6411(02)00037-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organ distribution of cisplatin after intraperitoneal administration of cisplatin-loaded microspheres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Gelatin nanoparticles (NPs) (600 nm) [16] or polymeric NPs (265 nm) [22] were also considered for IP drug delivery, although their abilities to control drug release and persist in the peritoneal cavity were quite limited [16, 22]. In this regard, larger particles (4–6 μm [16, 23] or 47 μm [24]) were found to be superior to NPs in their retention in the peritoneal cavity and maintenance of drug level [16]. Similarly, 1 μm liposomes were better retained in the peritoneal cavity than 100 nm liposomes [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gelatin nanoparticles (NPs) (600 nm) [16] or polymeric NPs (265 nm) [22] were also considered for IP drug delivery, although their abilities to control drug release and persist in the peritoneal cavity were quite limited [16, 22]. In this regard, larger particles (4–6 μm [16, 23] or 47 μm [24]) were found to be superior to NPs in their retention in the peritoneal cavity and maintenance of drug level [16]. Similarly, 1 μm liposomes were better retained in the peritoneal cavity than 100 nm liposomes [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partly due to this reason, recent studies comparing drug concentrations in the peritoneal cavity, plasma, and major organs after IP administration of different particle formulations concluded that microparticles, whose sizes range from 4 to 6 µm (32,33) to 47 µm (39), were an optimal formulation for IP administration. Microparticles were cleared from the peritoneal cavity relatively slowly and had a better ability to retain the drug (32,33).…”
Section: Drug Delivery Systems For Ip Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first-line treatment of ovarian cancer involves use of platinum based chemotherapeutic agents, such as cisplatin along with other anti-cancer drugs such as paclitaxel [4][5][6]. Cisplatin is widely used for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis by Intraperitoneal (IP) administration [7,8]. Although clinical studies have demonstrated the superior efficacy of IP chemotherapy of cisplatin compared to Intravenous (IV) chemotherapy, IP cisplatin chemotherapy suffers from major drawbacks, such as poor penetration of cisplatin into peritoneal tumors and dose-limiting systemic toxicity due to infiltration of cisplatin into systemic circulation through peritoneum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%