2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62582-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organ ischemia during partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: Dynamic 4D Computed tomography in swine

Abstract: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (ReBoA) increases proximal pressure, and simultaneously induces distal ischemia. We aimed to evaluate organ ischemia during partial ReBoA (p-ReBoA) with computed tomography (ct) perfusion in a swine model. the maximum balloon volume was recorded as total ReBoA when the distal pulse pressure ceased. the animals (n = 4) were scanned at each 20% of the maximum balloon volume, and time-density curve (TDC) were analysed at the aorta, portal vein (pV), liver … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Partial aortic occlusion demonstrates clear advantages over complete aortic occlusion in clinical and preclinical literature despite differences in study designs (including the degree of shock induced, comorbid injuries, how partial REBOA was achieved, duration of occlusion, and degree of occlusion). The literature shows that partial REBOA can reduce ongoing hemorrhage compared with no REBOA 25 preserve distal blood flow, 17,21,24,26,31,32,37 reduce ischemia or organ injury 20,24,26,31e33,37,40 extend occlusion time 20,25,49 reduce proximal hypertension 20,31,37,38 reduce resuscitation requirements compared with cREBOA 31,33,54 improve survival compared with either no REBOA or cREBOA. 20,25,26 In the animal literature, combined controlled and uncontrolled hemorrhage models are more common in the recent publications, with all but one published in 2019 and 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Partial aortic occlusion demonstrates clear advantages over complete aortic occlusion in clinical and preclinical literature despite differences in study designs (including the degree of shock induced, comorbid injuries, how partial REBOA was achieved, duration of occlusion, and degree of occlusion). The literature shows that partial REBOA can reduce ongoing hemorrhage compared with no REBOA 25 preserve distal blood flow, 17,21,24,26,31,32,37 reduce ischemia or organ injury 20,24,26,31e33,37,40 extend occlusion time 20,25,49 reduce proximal hypertension 20,31,37,38 reduce resuscitation requirements compared with cREBOA 31,33,54 improve survival compared with either no REBOA or cREBOA. 20,25,26 In the animal literature, combined controlled and uncontrolled hemorrhage models are more common in the recent publications, with all but one published in 2019 and 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have modeled the flow distally past the pREBOA, 16 the diminished ischemic injuries to distal organs, 17,19,20 and the ease of titrating the pREBOA to modify flow when compared with the ER-REBOA. 15 This is the first study that examined the changes to proximal perfusion in a severe hemorrhagic shock model using pREBOA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the ischemia below the balloon, in the context of hemorrhage, noticeable results have been achieved by partial occlusion (p-REBOA) [39,40], which limits the bleeding allowing a minimum but sufficient perfusion of the splanchnic organs [41]. This technique is not practicable during NTCA but could be useful when ROSC is achieved.…”
Section: Pitfalls and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 99%