“…17 Partial aortic occlusion demonstrates clear advantages over complete aortic occlusion in clinical and preclinical literature despite differences in study designs (including the degree of shock induced, comorbid injuries, how partial REBOA was achieved, duration of occlusion, and degree of occlusion). The literature shows that partial REBOA can reduce ongoing hemorrhage compared with no REBOA 25 preserve distal blood flow, 17,21,24,26,31,32,37 reduce ischemia or organ injury 20,24,26,31e33,37,40 extend occlusion time 20,25,49 reduce proximal hypertension 20,31,37,38 reduce resuscitation requirements compared with cREBOA 31,33,54 improve survival compared with either no REBOA or cREBOA. 20,25,26 In the animal literature, combined controlled and uncontrolled hemorrhage models are more common in the recent publications, with all but one published in 2019 and 2020.…”