2009
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3181943c76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Histocompatibility Committee Collaborative Study to Evaluate Prediction of Crossmatch Results in Highly Sensitized Patients

Abstract: The above results showed that with the advent of solid phase immunoassays, HLA antibodies can now be accurately detected resulting in prediction of crossmatch outcome. This should facilitate organ allocation and prevents shipment of organs to distant incompatible recipients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whenever possible, kidney transplantation should be performed in the absence of DSAs. Virtual cross-matching, recently promoted by the United Network for Organ Sharing, 29 consists of selecting potential donors without HLA specificities against a recipient's antibodies, predicting a negative CXM. The use of the virtual cross-matching permits expanding the geographic regions from which kidneys can be drawn and reduces waiting time and deaths on the waiting list.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever possible, kidney transplantation should be performed in the absence of DSAs. Virtual cross-matching, recently promoted by the United Network for Organ Sharing, 29 consists of selecting potential donors without HLA specificities against a recipient's antibodies, predicting a negative CXM. The use of the virtual cross-matching permits expanding the geographic regions from which kidneys can be drawn and reduces waiting time and deaths on the waiting list.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 When this approach is used in lieu of an actual cell-based crossmatch, it is called a virtual crossmatch. 5,8,[13][14][15][16] The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network administered by the United Network for Organ Sharing implemented a calculated panel-reactive antibody (CPRA) based on UA assignment and their frequency in the donor population to provide a more accountable measure of sensitization and to assign priority points for kidney organ allocation. Although not used for allocation of thoracic organs, the CPRA is used to assess the probability of an incompatible donor in the donor pool for thoracic organ candidates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual crossmatching is particularly challenging in the KPD setting because the majority of waitlisted patients are highly sensitized to HLA (10,11) and the results for cellbased crossmatches are often difficult to predict (12)(13)(14). Strategies that have been developed to improve virtual crossmatch accuracy for this population include utilizing a core laboratory (15), specifying thresholds for assigning unacceptable HLA types (13,16) and allowing centers to enter two sets of antigens, one representing the center's criteria for automatic refusal and another that includes antibodies that are not an automatic contraindication but could be a problem, particularly when there are several weak donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) (17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%