2017
DOI: 10.13080/z-a.2017.104.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organic carbon stock in different types of mineral soils in cropland and grassland in Latvia

Abstract: Globally, agricultural mineral soils can be either sources or sinks of carbon (C) depending on the land use, environmental conditions and management activities. In Latvia, land use change in cropland and grassland categories, including afforestation and deforestation, are the key sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It is requested by the guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to use verified scientific methodology and scientifically proven emission factors and data sources in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
9
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, data from 218 plots were used to calculate an average organic carbon stock for each soil and land use combination. In mineral soils, the organic carbon stock at 0-40 cm depth amounted to 83.9 ± 7.1 t ha −1 C and 89.4 ± 12.0 t ha −1 C for cropland and grassland soils, respectively, while in organic soils, these were higher at 122.0 ± 45.2 t ha −1 C in cropland and 208.2 ± 22.9 t ha −1 C in grassland (Bardule et al, 2017). The average carbon stock was 97.8 ± 14.7 t ha −1 C in afforested agricultural land (Lazdiņš et al, 2015) and 268.5 t ha −1 C in afforested organic soils (Lazdins et al, 2014).…”
Section: Supply Of Carbon Regulationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this study, data from 218 plots were used to calculate an average organic carbon stock for each soil and land use combination. In mineral soils, the organic carbon stock at 0-40 cm depth amounted to 83.9 ± 7.1 t ha −1 C and 89.4 ± 12.0 t ha −1 C for cropland and grassland soils, respectively, while in organic soils, these were higher at 122.0 ± 45.2 t ha −1 C in cropland and 208.2 ± 22.9 t ha −1 C in grassland (Bardule et al, 2017). The average carbon stock was 97.8 ± 14.7 t ha −1 C in afforested agricultural land (Lazdiņš et al, 2015) and 268.5 t ha −1 C in afforested organic soils (Lazdins et al, 2014).…”
Section: Supply Of Carbon Regulationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Initial carbon stock in mineral soil (60 tons C ha -1 ) is estimated using Yasso model as an average steady state value. No difference is set between cropland and grassland, following the results of earlier studies [11]. Assumptions on carbon stock change in mineral soils due to afforestation are estimated using Yasso model within the scope of elaboration of the National Forest Reference Level [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pastaraisiais metais įvairiose pasaulio šalyse atliekama vis daugiau tyrimų, susijusių su dirvožemio C org. ir dirvožemio azotu (Kõlli et al, 2010;Bardule et al, 2017). Žemės ūkio tikslams naudojamuose žemapelkės durpžemiuose yra sukaupta daug dirvožemio C org.…”
Section: įVadasunclassified
“…Tyrimui buvo pasirinkti trys žemapelkės durpžemio variantai: 1) žemapelkės durpžemyje augo natūrali pieva, plotas buvo ganomas, peraugusi žolė mulčiuota; 2) žemapelkės durpžemyje augo kultūrinė pieva, ji per sezoną tris kartus pjauta, žolė išvežta; 3) žemapelkės durpžemis kiekvienais matais artas, auginti migliniai javai: 3 . Išryškėjo tendencija, kad durpžemis, kuriame augo migliniai javai, buvo mažiau rūgštus.…”
Section: Tyrimų Metodai Ir Sąlygosunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation