Landolt-Börnstein - Group IV Physical Chemistry
DOI: 10.1007/10688583_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organic Compounds, C1 to C57. Part 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 250 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, p j is the partial pressure of component j , and p • j (T ) is the pure liquid component saturation vapour pressure calculated at the measurement temperatures using the Antoine equation with coefficients from the Landolt-Börnstein database (Dykyj et al, 2000), from Yaws et al (2005) or, in some cases, the p • j (T ) are directly available from the reference of the experimental VLE data. Except for monocarboxylic acids such as formic, acetic, and propionic acid, which exhibit significant gas phase association (dimers, trimers), assuming an ideal gas mixture for the total pressure and temperature ranges of the data is acceptable.…”
Section: Vapour-liquid Equilibriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, p j is the partial pressure of component j , and p • j (T ) is the pure liquid component saturation vapour pressure calculated at the measurement temperatures using the Antoine equation with coefficients from the Landolt-Börnstein database (Dykyj et al, 2000), from Yaws et al (2005) or, in some cases, the p • j (T ) are directly available from the reference of the experimental VLE data. Except for monocarboxylic acids such as formic, acetic, and propionic acid, which exhibit significant gas phase association (dimers, trimers), assuming an ideal gas mixture for the total pressure and temperature ranges of the data is acceptable.…”
Section: Vapour-liquid Equilibriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the usage of the air thermostat led to decreasing of the temperature fluctuations in the bath. The uncertainties of the vapor pressure measurements were estimated by comparison of measured values p(H 2 O) and recommended by Dykyj et al [12] in the temperature range of 277.15e311.15 K; a relative error does not exceed 0.5%. Components of solutions for vapor pressure measurements were weighted on an AXIS AG300 balance with an accuracy of 0.001 g. Mass of samples were 20e30 g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal gas equation of state was used for the vapor pressure calculation. Data on the saturated vapor pressure of the water were taken from ref . The enthalpy of mixing could be calculated from Gibbs–Helmholtz equation: Volume of the phase is connected with its Gibbs energy by the partial derivative of the Gibbs energy with respect to pressure at constant temperature and amount of components: The Gibbs energy of the solution is calculated by the following expression: where μ i 0 is the molar Gibbs energy of pure liquid i .…”
Section: Thermodynamic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%