Organic double D–π–A sensitizers based on 2,2′-(2,2 diphenylethene-1,1-diyl)dithiophene: π-conjugation fragment effect on the photovoltaic properties

Zhou, Pengjuan; Lin, Bobing; Chen, Ran; Liang, Jianying; Weng, Qiang; Chen, Xinbing; Chen, Pei

doi:10.1039/d1ma00728a

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 50 publications

(50 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Semitransparent organic solar cells (ST-OSCs) possess huge potential for constructing wearable energy sources and functional building integration in comparison to their inorganic counterparts. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Recently, tremendous efforts have focused on developing novel materials with the enhancement of nearinfrared utilization while maintaining the weaker visible light absorption to deal with the tradeoff between the power conversion efficiency (PCE) and average visible transmittance (AVT). [8][9][10][11] Additionally, employing the extra optical coupling architectures such as the microcavity-embedded electrodes or the Bragg reflector with periodic arrangement of the refraction indexes suggests promising potentials for practical applications such as the windows with neutral chrominance or decoration to cater the public aesthetic values.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Device Architecture and Interfacial Layer on Performance of Semitransparent Organic Solar Cells

Xiao,

Zhang,

et al. 2024

Solar RRL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Semitransparent organic solar cells (ST‐OSCs) generally suffer from voltage loss in comparison to their opaque counterparts. Herein, ST‐OSCs constructed with conventional and inverted structures have been explored, respectively. The voltage losses of the inverted ST‐OSCs are lower than that of the conventional architectures when the thicknesses of the top transparent electrodes approach the percolation threshold, which is attributed to the larger surface energy of the bottom seeding layers, higher built‐in electric fields and lower recombination losses. Moreover, ST‐OSCs with conventional architectures based on four commonly used electrode transporting layers (ETLs) PDINN, PDINO,PNDIT‐F3N and PFN‐Br are employed to distinguish the Voc variation when capping with 10 nm top electrodes. It is revealed that ETL with larger surface energy and a stronger ability to reduce the cathode work function is more beneficial for reducing the voltage loss for ST‐OSCs. This work demonstrates the crucial role of device structure and interfacial layers in optimizing the ST‐OSC device performance.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Device Architecture and Interfacial Layer on Performance of Semitransparent Organic Solar Cells

Xiao,

Zhang,

et al. 2024

Solar RRL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Organic double D–π–A sensitizers based on 2,2′-(2,2 diphenylethene-1,1-diyl)dithiophene: π-conjugation fragment effect on the photovoltaic properties

Abstract: The development of the new dye sensitizers to further reveal the influence of changes in structural components on photovoltaic performance is of great significance to dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The...

Cited by 1 publication

References 50 publications

The Role of Device Architecture and Interfacial Layer on Performance of Semitransparent Organic Solar Cells

The Role of Device Architecture and Interfacial Layer on Performance of Semitransparent Organic Solar Cells

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About