Organic Farming Sharpens Plant Defenses in the Field

Abstract

Plants deploy a variety of chemical and physical defenses to protect themselves against herbivores and pathogens. Organic farming seeks to enhance these responses by improving soil quality, ultimately altering bottom up regulation of plant defenses. While laboratory studies suggest this approach is effective, it remains unclear whether organic agriculture encourages more-active plant defenses under real-world conditions. Working on the farms of cooperating growers, we examined gene expression in the leaves of two potato (Solanum tuberosum) varieties, grown on organic vs. conventional farms. For one variety, Norkotah, we found significantly heightened initiation of genes associated with plant-defense pathways in plants grown in organic vs. conventional fields. Organic Norkotah fields exhibited lower levels of nitrate in soil and of nitrogen in plant foliage, alongside differences in communities of soil bacteria, suggesting possible links between soil management and observed differences in plant defenses. Additionally, numbers of predatory and phloem-feeding insects were higher in organic than conventional fields. A second potato variety, Alturas, which is generally grown using fewer inputs and in poorer-quality soils, exhibited lower overall herbivore and predator numbers, few differences in soil ecology, and no differences in gene-activity in organic and conventional farming systems. Altogether, our results suggest that organic farming has the potential to increase plants' resistance to herbivores, possibly facilitating reduced need for insecticide applications. These benefits appear to be mediated by plant variety and/or farming context.

‘None of my ancestors ever discussed this disease before!’ How disease information shapes adaptive capacity of marginalised rural populations in India

“…The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for instance, in its Fifth Assessment Report, predicted with high confidence that climate change, among other stresses, will reduce agricultural yields, aggravate water stress and alter the ecology of infectious disease vectors across the Global South through changes in temperature and precipitation patterns [8,3,9]. Nonetheless, the ability of small-holder farmer and tribal communities' to adapt may be impaired by inequities that systematically constrain access to essential and productive resources, such as reliable disease information [10,11,12]. Disease information in the context of this study refers to the various set of information and messages that are relevant for the prevention and control of KFD such as adopting personal protection measures, use of tick repellents (e.g.…”

Offsetting unabated agricultural emissions with CO2 removal to achieve ambitious climate targets

“…Yet, there is a large gap between the modelled assumptions of a globally harmonized price on agricultural emissions and the reality of agricultural climate policies. To date, no single country currently imposes carbon prices on agricultural emissions [ 15 ]. Public opinion research, as well as the unresolved decades-long debates in New Zealand, the only country discussing their introduction, suggest that stringent agricultural climate policies will encounter large socio-political resistance [ 15 , 29 ].…”

“…Given these challenges to achieve rapid reductions in agricultural emissions, a substantial gap between modelled emission pathways and reality appear imminent [15]. If agricultural emissions are not mitigated beyond current levels, the remaining carbon budget to reach the 1.5˚C target is cut by more than half [33][34][35].…”

“…In the absence of transformative policies and technical mitigation options [ 11 ], agricultural non-CO 2 emissions would reduce the remaining carbon budget so as to result in infeasible emission reduction targets for CO 2 [ 1 , 6 – 8 , 14 , 15 ]. Although agricultural productivity shows signs of decoupling from its emissions [ 16 ], an ever-growing demand for food production has caused an increase in the absolute agricultural-sector emissions over recent decades [ 17 ].…”

“…In this study, we explore the use of CDR to offset agricultural emissions of methane and nitrous oxide overshooting the RCP2.6 budget. Although previous studies address the substitutability between more or less ambitious reductions of (agricultural) methane emissions and allowable CO 2 emissions in general [ 15 , 56 ], these substitutions have never been explicitly investigated in the context of offsetting via CDR. Reliable estimates of CDR requirements are essential to correctly offset the additional agricultural methane and nitrous oxide emissions.…”