“…Furthermore, metal–metal cavity photodetectors based on the P3HT:PCBM system as well as on the poly[3‐(5‐(4‐(2‐ethylhexyl)‐4H‐dithieno[3,2‐b:2′,3′‐d]pyrrol‐2‐yl)thiophen‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐bis(2‐hexyldecyl)‐6‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐dihydropyrrolo[3,4‐c]pyrrole‐1,4‐dione]:1,1′,3,3′,8,8′,10,10′‐octaoxo‐2,2′,9,9′‐tetra(undecan‐6‐yl)‐1,1′,2,2′,3,3′,8,8′,9,9′,10,10′‐dodecahydro‐[5,5′‐bianthra[2,1,9‐def:6,5,10‐d′e′f′]diisoquinoline]‐13,13′‐dicarbonitrile (PDPPTDTPT:SdiCNPBI) blend are fabricated. For the latter, with a low E CT (≈ 0.7 eV), detection wavelengths are easily extended to a remarkable range of 1000–1700 nm (details in Sections SI‐3 and SI‐4, Supporting Information), which is among the longest detection wavelengths reported for organic photodetectors . However, due to the absence of intercalation, both blend systems result in photodetectors with low EQE (<10%), agreeing well with the results shown in Figure b.…”