2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2006.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organic matter and metamorphic history of CO chondrites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
214
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
19
214
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed that (1) 26 Al was the only heat source of a chondrite parent body, and was uniformly distributed in the protoplanetary disk with the canonical 26 Al/ 27 Al ratio of 5.25 Â 10 À 5 ; (2) some regions of these parent bodies reached 100 À 200°C (temperature range of fayalite formation 28 ) at the time of fayalite formation; and (3) that these regions avoided subsequent heating above 300°C (to preclude Fe-Mg diffusion in secondary fayalite). Supplementary Table 6 (part 1) defines parameters specific to the parent bodies from which the L, CV and CO chondrites were derived, such as the fayalite formation ages (Figs 4 and 5) and peak metamorphic temperatures experienced by these parent bodies 23,31,32 . We note that using an initial 26 Al/ 27 Al ratio of 5.25 Â 10 À 5 , rather than 5 Â 10 À 5 , corresponds to 0.05 Myr, which is well within the uncertainty of our isotope measurements (0.4 À 1.8 Myr).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed that (1) 26 Al was the only heat source of a chondrite parent body, and was uniformly distributed in the protoplanetary disk with the canonical 26 Al/ 27 Al ratio of 5.25 Â 10 À 5 ; (2) some regions of these parent bodies reached 100 À 200°C (temperature range of fayalite formation 28 ) at the time of fayalite formation; and (3) that these regions avoided subsequent heating above 300°C (to preclude Fe-Mg diffusion in secondary fayalite). Supplementary Table 6 (part 1) defines parameters specific to the parent bodies from which the L, CV and CO chondrites were derived, such as the fayalite formation ages (Figs 4 and 5) and peak metamorphic temperatures experienced by these parent bodies 23,31,32 . We note that using an initial 26 Al/ 27 Al ratio of 5.25 Â 10 À 5 , rather than 5 Â 10 À 5 , corresponds to 0.05 Myr, which is well within the uncertainty of our isotope measurements (0.4 À 1.8 Myr).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the molecular structure of IOM between different classes of carbonaceous chondrites have been interpreted as consequences of parent-body heating and/or aqueous reactions. In particular, heating processes increase ordering and size of aromatic units and loss of the most labile constituents (Bonal et al 2007;Bonal et al 2006;Cody et al 2008;Remusat et al 2008;Sephton et al 2003), whereas hydrothermal alteration oxidizes IOM, adding hydroxyl groups and lowering the aliphatic component (Cody & Alexander 2005;Remusat et al 2005;Yabuta et al 2005). Nevertheless, very high D/H ratios in ordinary chondrites relative to other groups that appear to have undergone similar heating (CO and CV) are difficult to understand in the context of this interpretation of the origins of diversity among IOM components in chondritic meteorites (Alexander et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by Raman spectrometry, the structural order of the carbonaceous matter increases with temperature [92,93]. There is a clear trend in losing the heteroelements, evidenced by a decrease in H/C, N/C and O/C elemental ratios, and in increasing the size of aromatic units [77,94].…”
Section: Diversity Among the Different Types Of Chondrites: Influencementioning
confidence: 95%