2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-012-5202-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organic photovoltaic cells: Novel organic semiconducting materials and molecular arrangement engineering

Abstract: Organic photovoltaic cells (OPVs) have attracted more and more attention due to its highly potential application to solve the energy crisis considering its advantages, such as low cost and ease of large area production. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of OPVs has undergone a more than nine-fold increase from ~1.0% by Tang in 1986 to 9.2% in 2010 announced by Mitsubishi Chemical. The major challenges of obtaining high efficiency OPVs are the synthesis of new narrow band gap materials, controlling molecula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PL emission of Ir(btpy) 3 molecules could be totally quenched by doping lower concentration PCBM (not shown), which means that photo-generated excitons on Ir(btpy) 3 could be dissociated into free charge carriers by PCBM, resulting in the product of photovoltaic effect between Ir(btpy) 3 and PCBM. It is known that the oc of PSCs is determined by the energy difference between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the donor and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the acceptor [31]. Therefore, the increase of oc should be attributed to the larger bandgap of Ir(btpy) 3 compared with P3HT according to their PL and absorption spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PL emission of Ir(btpy) 3 molecules could be totally quenched by doping lower concentration PCBM (not shown), which means that photo-generated excitons on Ir(btpy) 3 could be dissociated into free charge carriers by PCBM, resulting in the product of photovoltaic effect between Ir(btpy) 3 and PCBM. It is known that the oc of PSCs is determined by the energy difference between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the donor and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the acceptor [31]. Therefore, the increase of oc should be attributed to the larger bandgap of Ir(btpy) 3 compared with P3HT according to their PL and absorption spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the increased J sat can be attributed to the effective charge-carrier transport and collection for the pero-HSCs W/ LiSPS. [ 65 ] In the low effective voltage range, namely V eff < 0.1 V, the J ph -V eff characteristics of the two pero-HSCs showed distinct differences. The peroHSCs W/O LiSPS showed a smaller value of J ph / J sat than that of the pero-HSCs W/ LiSPS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The key parameters of PSCs are summarized in Table 1. It is apparent that Cells D have relatively larger oc than those of Cells A and B, and the oc of Cells D remain almost the same compared with that of Cells C. As we know oc of PSCs is primarily determined by two factors: (i) the energy levels difference between the HOMO International Journal of Photoenergy of the electron donor and the LUMO of electron acceptor and (ii) the work function difference between anode and cathode electrode [20]. It could be assumed that the improved oc of Cells D was due to the changes of anode work function since the active layer fabrication condition and the cathode layer deposition remain constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%