2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-4754.2003.00132.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ORGANIC SUBSTANCES AT METAL SURFACES: ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE AND THE ELDER PLINY's ACCOUNT*

Abstract: This paper discusses the implications of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning Auger microscopy (SAM) results that revealed the presence of sizable amounts of carbon-bearing species at the joint of a Roman lead pipe (fistula) and at the surface of a Roman bronze statue. The detailed description in Pliny's Naturalis Historia on the use of oil, pitch and bitumen in metallurgical contexts offers convincing grounds for an interpretation that the experimental findings arise from deliberate addition of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose that such an excess arises from intentional use of organic substances, such as oil, wax etc., and that these materials are also responsible for the lower copper oxidation extent in bronze A. [19] One could argue that the high copper 'metallization' and the high carbon abundance are not necessarily related to one another because even adventitious, ambient contaminants themselves produce a C1s component at BE ∼285 eV. In response to this objection, we call attention to the following two considerations: (i) As is well known, [3,4,12] tin minimizes the surface oxidation of copper in bronze (and also that of Pb in tin-lead alloys), [19] and the force of this beneficial effect scales with the tin abundance at the surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We propose that such an excess arises from intentional use of organic substances, such as oil, wax etc., and that these materials are also responsible for the lower copper oxidation extent in bronze A. [19] One could argue that the high copper 'metallization' and the high carbon abundance are not necessarily related to one another because even adventitious, ambient contaminants themselves produce a C1s component at BE ∼285 eV. In response to this objection, we call attention to the following two considerations: (i) As is well known, [3,4,12] tin minimizes the surface oxidation of copper in bronze (and also that of Pb in tin-lead alloys), [19] and the force of this beneficial effect scales with the tin abundance at the surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] One could argue that the high copper 'metallization' and the high carbon abundance are not necessarily related to one another because even adventitious, ambient contaminants themselves produce a C1s component at BE ∼285 eV. In response to this objection, we call attention to the following two considerations: (i) As is well known, [3,4,12] tin minimizes the surface oxidation of copper in bronze (and also that of Pb in tin-lead alloys), [19] and the force of this beneficial effect scales with the tin abundance at the surface. In fact, the tin content in bronze A is about 10% lower than in bronze B (Table 1), and this conflicts with the finding that the former bronze features the higher copper metallization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations