1988
DOI: 10.1016/0378-3820(88)90071-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organic sulfur removal from coal by electrolysis in alkaline media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All the methods are still problematic due to lower efficiency, surrounding pollution and harsh reaction conditions, hindering their application. However, ore water slurry electrolysis can solve above problems in removal of sulfur (Zhong et al, 2011;Wapner et al, 1988;Farooque and Coughlin, 1979;Lam et al, 2012;Shen et al, 2012). Electrolysis not only achieved higher desulfurization efficiency under mild condition, but also reduced the pollution of the environment risk (Li, 2000;Lalvani and Pata, 1983;Lavani, 1985;Lalvani et al, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All the methods are still problematic due to lower efficiency, surrounding pollution and harsh reaction conditions, hindering their application. However, ore water slurry electrolysis can solve above problems in removal of sulfur (Zhong et al, 2011;Wapner et al, 1988;Farooque and Coughlin, 1979;Lam et al, 2012;Shen et al, 2012). Electrolysis not only achieved higher desulfurization efficiency under mild condition, but also reduced the pollution of the environment risk (Li, 2000;Lalvani and Pata, 1983;Lavani, 1985;Lalvani et al, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Choosing a suitable potential for electrolysis is a crucial step in potentiostatic methods, since the electrochemical desulfurization of fossil fuels shows potential dependence. Wapner et al [28] observed this potential dependence in the desulfurization of coal. They found that higher potentials (1.6-2.0 V vs. SCE) facilitated the organic sulfur removal, and lower potentials (1.2-1.4 V vs. SCE) preferred for pyritic sulfur removal.…”
Section: Static Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it has been observed that desulfurization of organic sulfur compounds in NaOH occurred even without an applied potential [40]. Wapner and Lalvani [28] observed that up to 56% sulfur removal from coal slurries in 1 M NaOH after 6 h under open circuit conditions, during which up to 42% of the organic sulfur content was removed. One disadvantage of this method is the formation of ash.…”
Section: Basic Electrolytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, at room temperature the alkali is not able to cleave the more strongly-bonded sulfur compounds without an added energy input. Electrolysis appears to be capable of supplying the energy for the alkali reaction (Lalvani and Hines, 1987;Wapner et al, 1988). At approximately ambient temperature, the reaction removes the pyritic sulfur and roughly 40% of the organic sulfur.…”
Section: Aqueous Alkalimentioning
confidence: 99%