2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.140780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organic transformation, lactic acid metabolism, and membrane performance in high-rate methanogenic treatment of dairy processing wastewater using thermophilic high-solid anaerobic membrane bioreactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneously, the sludge yield of the AnMBR increased from 268 ± 31 to 321 ± 18 mg of TS/g of COD under decreased HRT and increased OLR conditions (Figure b). In addition, the treatment efficiency of the converted methane yield at 406–415 mL CH 4 /g volatile solids in this study was higher than that in previous studies on primary sludge treatment at 171–334 mL CH 4 /g volatile solids. , The concentration of mixed-liquor TS in the AnMBR was maintained at a high level of 30–40 g/L, which theoretically provided a longer substrate retention time, longer SRT, and higher microbial concentration compared to general CSTR (15–25 g/L mixed-liquor TS), thus enhancing the substrate degradation efficiency, methane yield, microbial robustness, and system stability. , …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simultaneously, the sludge yield of the AnMBR increased from 268 ± 31 to 321 ± 18 mg of TS/g of COD under decreased HRT and increased OLR conditions (Figure b). In addition, the treatment efficiency of the converted methane yield at 406–415 mL CH 4 /g volatile solids in this study was higher than that in previous studies on primary sludge treatment at 171–334 mL CH 4 /g volatile solids. , The concentration of mixed-liquor TS in the AnMBR was maintained at a high level of 30–40 g/L, which theoretically provided a longer substrate retention time, longer SRT, and higher microbial concentration compared to general CSTR (15–25 g/L mixed-liquor TS), thus enhancing the substrate degradation efficiency, methane yield, microbial robustness, and system stability. , …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Previous studies on the AD of CEPT sludge have used a traditional continuous stirring-tank reactor (CSTR); however, this method has limitations in terms of treatment efficiency, low sludge degradation efficiency, and long hydraulic retention time (HRT) requirements. , Despite the recent encouragement for the use of AnMBRs to significantly improve bioenergy recovery efficiency, leveraging their ability to achieve a modulated short HRT with a long sludge retention time (SRT), their application in Fe-PS treatment has not yet been reported. Additionally, in situ membrane separation avoids the use of complex sludge dewatering steps and directly provides a high concentration of iron-rich digested sludge and ammonium-rich permeate for subsequent acidification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox)-based nitrogen removal processes, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%