2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organic transistor model with nonlinear injection: Effects of uneven source contact on apparent mobility and threshold voltage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) reveals a decrease of the apparent mobility with gate voltage. This behavior is due to high source and drain contact resistances and leads to an underestimation of the intrinsic mobility . The hump nonlinearity sometimes obtained in the transfer characteristic (shown in Fig.…”
Section: Ideal Otftmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(b) reveals a decrease of the apparent mobility with gate voltage. This behavior is due to high source and drain contact resistances and leads to an underestimation of the intrinsic mobility . The hump nonlinearity sometimes obtained in the transfer characteristic (shown in Fig.…”
Section: Ideal Otftmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, in the real world many parameters can influence the transistor threshold, and even its definition can be discussed. For interested readers some elements can be found in references 8 and 9.…”
Section: Ideal Otftmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some situations, injection limitations cannot be modelled in the form of contact resistances due to their non‐linearity . This occurs when: i ) large energetic barriers are present, for instance in case of P3HT with Cr contacts, where Φ B is expected to be larger than 0.3 eV58–60); ii ) accessible site density in the semiconductor is lower than the monomer density61 and iii ) in case of low barriers, but taking into account the charge and field dependence of the mobility along the depleted contact region. The latter effect requires a strong mobility field dependence, such as the one found in the Pasveer/Coehoorn model62 where ln( μ ) ∝ E for high fields, while it is barely noticeable if the mobility has a Poole‐Frenkel dependence, ln( μ ) ∝ E 0.5 47.…”
Section: Charge Injection In Ofetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the bottom-contact structure is suited for potential measurements related to the channel charge distribution, KPFM-AM imaging has been performed on various types of organic thin film devices based on pentacene (Hallam et al, 2009;Nakamura et al, 2009;Yogev et al, 2010;Yogev et al, 2011;Li et al, 2012a,b;Celle et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2014;Yogev & Rosenwaks, 2014), poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) (Bürgi et al, 2003;Liscio et al, 2012;Kehrer et al, 2013;Musumeci et al, 2014), perylene (Luttich et al, 2012) or oligothiopene (Afsharimani & Nysten, 2012). KPFM also facilitates the characterisation of the carrier injection process at electrode/organic semiconductor interfaces by measuring an injection potential drop (Bürgi et al, 2003;Simonetti et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%