“…4 and 2D-WAXS/SAXS in Figs. 5 and 6a) display the following interference maxima, which can be correlated with the structural features of their components: LCEM: q = 1.4 Å À1 (intense and somewhat broad; corresponds to d = 4.4 Å which can be assigned to the lateral distance of LCEM rods), q = 0.75 Å À1 (weak, d = 8.4 Å), q = 0.49 Å À1 (weak, d = 13 Å, corresponds to the width of the aromatic core), 0.32 Å À1 (weak, second order maximum of the reflection at q = 0.16 Å À1 ), q = 0.16 Å À1 (intense, d = 39 Å, corresponds approximately to the LCEM length); DDM: q = 0.63 Å À1 (weak, d = 10 Å, corresponds approximately to the length of DDM, not prominent in 2D-SAXS), non-characteristic reflections in the range 1.0-2.0 Å À1 ; NR: q = 0.51 Å À1 (d = 12.3 Å; distance between arrays of electron-rich P and Al atoms in the cores of the NR molecules, as assigned in [30] and verified by comparing homologues with different substituents on NR surface in [30] vs. [29]; in the studied case, d = 12.3 Å is also similar to the width of the entire NR molecule), three maxima between q = 1.3 and 1.5 Å À1 (corresponding to regular Al-Al, P-P and other atoms distances along the main axis of the rod-like NR molecule [30]). The intense reflections at q = 1.40 Å À1 (LCEM), 0.51 Å À1 (NR) and q = 0.16 Å À1 (LCEM) were investigated with 2D-WAXS and -SAXS (see Scheme 6), in order to assess the orientation of LCEM and NR.…”