Abstract:John Searle has mistakenly claimed that emergence is the central concept in the account of social ontology defended by Tony Lawson, the central figure in the project now regularly referred to as Cambridge Social Ontology. This is not the case. Rather, if any concept can be considered central for Lawson, it is organisation. In this paper, I explain how Searle could misunderstand Lawson and, in doing so, I bring out the importance of organisation for understanding how phenomena, both social and non‐social, are c… Show more
“…Another theory of emergence within critical realism is Lawson's organisational approach . As the name implies, organisation plays a crucial role in this conceptualisation (Slade‐Caffarel, 2020). Lawson (2012, 2013, 2016) argues that if the organisation of components in a determinate system makes a difference to the properties that the system has, then these properties are not reducible to the components, and instead must be regarded as something ontologically and causally distinct 2 from its components.…”
Section: Emergence In Critical Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this does not mean that an emergent system acts apart from its constituents, instead it acts through them. Although Lawson (2013) prefers not to speak of downward causation, because this acting through occurs as an interaction between components and organisational structure, this can be seen as a ‘kind’ of synchronic downward causation (Slade‐Caffarel, 2020)—a way in which a higher‐level (organisation) influences its components.…”
Emergence is central to critical realism, but there has been little attempt to develop a systematic account of this concept within the tradition. Two notable exceptions are seen in the work of Dave Elder‐Vass and Tony Lawson. However, both face problems in responding to reductionist claims and accounting for downward causation. This paper proposes contextual emergence as a robust alternative that overcomes these issues and provides a better justification for critical realism's stratified worldview. Contextual emergence explains that while properties at a lower ‘level’ offer necessary conditions, for emergence to obtain, there must also be contingent conditions at a higher ‘level’. This approach maintains many of critical realism's intuitions about emergence, providing a robust account of ontological stratification and downward causation.
“…Another theory of emergence within critical realism is Lawson's organisational approach . As the name implies, organisation plays a crucial role in this conceptualisation (Slade‐Caffarel, 2020). Lawson (2012, 2013, 2016) argues that if the organisation of components in a determinate system makes a difference to the properties that the system has, then these properties are not reducible to the components, and instead must be regarded as something ontologically and causally distinct 2 from its components.…”
Section: Emergence In Critical Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this does not mean that an emergent system acts apart from its constituents, instead it acts through them. Although Lawson (2013) prefers not to speak of downward causation, because this acting through occurs as an interaction between components and organisational structure, this can be seen as a ‘kind’ of synchronic downward causation (Slade‐Caffarel, 2020)—a way in which a higher‐level (organisation) influences its components.…”
Emergence is central to critical realism, but there has been little attempt to develop a systematic account of this concept within the tradition. Two notable exceptions are seen in the work of Dave Elder‐Vass and Tony Lawson. However, both face problems in responding to reductionist claims and accounting for downward causation. This paper proposes contextual emergence as a robust alternative that overcomes these issues and provides a better justification for critical realism's stratified worldview. Contextual emergence explains that while properties at a lower ‘level’ offer necessary conditions, for emergence to obtain, there must also be contingent conditions at a higher ‘level’. This approach maintains many of critical realism's intuitions about emergence, providing a robust account of ontological stratification and downward causation.
“…The relational aspect then provides order, structure, and a kind of stability to these changing processual entities. “It is the organization of these elements that is key to social constitution” (Lawson, 2022a, b, p. 1; see also Slade‐Caffarel, 2020).…”
Section: Social Positioning Theory and The Nature Of Bank Moneymentioning
The article examines the nature of bank money on two complementary levels. The first level deals with theoretical considerations. Here, the departure point is Social Positioning Theory, which provides a framework to investigate the nature of money. Within the theory, the paper situates bank money in credit‐debt relations, that are themselves integral part of a wider productive‐consumptive nexus of the economy. In this perspective, bank money is the relation, accounting economic positions of participating members, resulting from their economic activities realized within the context of the overall society. The second level uses the methods of Oral History and Memory Studies and, through semi‐structured interviews, provides empirical material illustrating ideas about the nature of money in a specific historical form. The article thus explores the contrasting experiences of banking in the context of a centrally planned economy and banking in the transformation to a market economy. These two contrasting episodes are illustrative because of the significant change in the form of bank money, which brings to light various aspects of its nature. Moreover, the article utilizes interviews that present the lived experience of bankers with years of involvement in the sector, enriching the perspective on the issue under study.
Social positioning theory, or an account of the human individual that it grounds, qualifies as a quantum social theory. This is an assessment that I explain and defend in the paper. It is of interest in that, in a world where increasing numbers are seeking to construct quantum social theories, it serves to help demonstrate that this goal can be achieved without giving up on meeting criteria like explanatory intelligibility or power or discarding real‐world notions like human (and other) entities. As it turns out, a central feature of the account defended and a core element of the ‘standard’ interpretation of quantum mechanics are found to stand in an interesting, unanticipated and suggestive relation to each other.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.