2020
DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.12251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organisation, Emergence and Cambridge Social Ontology

Abstract: John Searle has mistakenly claimed that emergence is the central concept in the account of social ontology defended by Tony Lawson, the central figure in the project now regularly referred to as Cambridge Social Ontology. This is not the case. Rather, if any concept can be considered central for Lawson, it is organisation. In this paper, I explain how Searle could misunderstand Lawson and, in doing so, I bring out the importance of organisation for understanding how phenomena, both social and non‐social, are c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another theory of emergence within critical realism is Lawson's organisational approach . As the name implies, organisation plays a crucial role in this conceptualisation (Slade‐Caffarel, 2020). Lawson (2012, 2013, 2016) argues that if the organisation of components in a determinate system makes a difference to the properties that the system has, then these properties are not reducible to the components, and instead must be regarded as something ontologically and causally distinct 2 from its components.…”
Section: Emergence In Critical Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another theory of emergence within critical realism is Lawson's organisational approach . As the name implies, organisation plays a crucial role in this conceptualisation (Slade‐Caffarel, 2020). Lawson (2012, 2013, 2016) argues that if the organisation of components in a determinate system makes a difference to the properties that the system has, then these properties are not reducible to the components, and instead must be regarded as something ontologically and causally distinct 2 from its components.…”
Section: Emergence In Critical Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this does not mean that an emergent system acts apart from its constituents, instead it acts through them. Although Lawson (2013) prefers not to speak of downward causation, because this acting through occurs as an interaction between components and organisational structure, this can be seen as a ‘kind’ of synchronic downward causation (Slade‐Caffarel, 2020)—a way in which a higher‐level (organisation) influences its components.…”
Section: Emergence In Critical Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relational aspect then provides order, structure, and a kind of stability to these changing processual entities. “It is the organization of these elements that is key to social constitution” (Lawson, 2022a, b, p. 1; see also Slade‐Caffarel, 2020).…”
Section: Social Positioning Theory and The Nature Of Bank Moneymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See for example Cardinale, Ivano and Jochen Runde 2021, Faulkner, Philip, and Jochen Runde 2013, 2019, Lawson Clive, 2017, Lawson Tony, 2007, 2012, 2015a, 2015b, 2015c, 2016a,b, 2018a,b, 2019c,b,c, 2022, 2023, Lawson Tony and Jamie Morgan 2021a,b, Lewis, Paul 2021, Martins, Nuno 2013, 2015, 2017,2022, 2023, Mensik, Josef 2022, Morgan, 2020, Pratten, Stephen 2017, 2018, 2020, 2022, Slade‐Caffarel, Yannick 2020, 2022. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%