2012
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2012.678992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organisation of executive functions: Hemispheric asymmetries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
54
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 225 publications
12
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, increased DMPFC activation may reflect error monitoring demands in relation to a greater reliance on evaluative processes engaged by participants, perhaps to ensure that their minimal effort expenditure generally met the minimal requirements of the WM task. Secondly, increased DMPFC activation may reflect the role of this area in energizing task-related areas that lack resources due to fatigue (Vallesi, 2012). However, it is difficult to reconcile DMPFC mobilization for energizing purposes with our findings of an associated reduced level of subjective effort (one may expect greater subjective effort in association with greater energizing needs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Therefore, increased DMPFC activation may reflect error monitoring demands in relation to a greater reliance on evaluative processes engaged by participants, perhaps to ensure that their minimal effort expenditure generally met the minimal requirements of the WM task. Secondly, increased DMPFC activation may reflect the role of this area in energizing task-related areas that lack resources due to fatigue (Vallesi, 2012). However, it is difficult to reconcile DMPFC mobilization for energizing purposes with our findings of an associated reduced level of subjective effort (one may expect greater subjective effort in association with greater energizing needs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the cognitive neuropsychological use of this method, the purpose of the grouping is not to produce a precise anatomical location of a function, but to be able to sum over the behaviours of individuals, who, it is presupposed, will tend to be functionally similar, because they have similar lesion sites. An example of a novel functional model that can be derived from group studies with such anatomically based inclusion criteria is the ROBBIA model of functional subdivisions of the supervisory system (Shallice & Gillingham, 2012;Stuss & Alexander, 2007;Vallesi, 2012).…”
Section: Implications: I Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis, and the short insular gyrus 967 (InlineSupplementary Table S2). These results provide some further support for the functional specificity of the β/α_HAS effects we found but, again, we suggest caution in their interpretation as they show a discrepancy between the skipped and regular correlation analyses.InlineSupplementary Tables S2 and S3can be found online at http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.035.In the present study, we aimed to test the hypothesis of a left-right prefrontal hemispheric specialization for executive functions mediating switching and mixing costs, respectively(Vallesi, 2012), as implied by the ROBBIA model of executive functions(Stuss, 2011; Stuss et al, 2005). Specifically, we investigated whether participants' hemispheric asymmetry in rsEEG spectral activity can reflect differences in their phasic and/or sustained cognitive control abilities regardless of the particular task specifics, and would therefore be predictive of their general switching and mixing costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%