Organisation, Organisationstheorien und Organisationsgestaltung

Frese, Erich; Graumann, Matthias; Theuvsen, Ludwig

doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-7103-6_2

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We mapped the study network as an organization. According to Frese and colleagues, organizations are characterized by (a) the involvement of several involved actors and their (single as well as collective) actions, and (b) the joint orientation towards a shared aim [15]. In their model, the single actions of one individual can influence the actions of others.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“I’ll leave that to the case managers.” Healthcare Service Providers‘ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change in a Randomized Controlled Trial—A Qualitative Analysis Exploring Implementation Success

Choi

Lindert

Schlomann

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Up to 50% of unsuccessful implementations of organizational change are due to a lack of organizational readiness for change (ORC). This qualitative study aims to investigate the experiences of occupational physicians (OPs) and staff of test and training centers (ETTCs) with team effectiveness in the context of ORC. The change setting is the implementation of a new occupational health program in a multicentric randomized controlled trial for musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in Germany. Two rounds of expert interviews with OPs (1st round: n = 10, 2nd round: n = 13) and one round of expert interviews with ETTCs (n = 9) were conducted and analyzed with a deductive–inductive procedure. The focus of the analysis was the assessment of change commitment and change efficacy, as well as their influence on general ORC on a collective level according to Weiner’s model (2009). Differential critical assessment of change by the care providers led to a missing collective change commitment and consequently to a missing organizational change commitment. Main inhibiting factors include lacking feedback about (e.g., recruitment) success, limited time resources of and narrow communication between responsible study staff, along with a low rate of utilization and limited adherence of the study population. Main facilitators include standardized procedures and documentation along with easy-access digital tools. Researchers may use the findings to improve the development of new intervention studies, especially in a randomized setting.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%