Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace 2010
DOI: 10.1201/ebk1439804896-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organisational Effects of Workplace Bullying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
87
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
87
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of detrimental outcomes has been shown to arise in the aftermath of bullying, for the individual target as well as at the organisational and societal level (Hoel, Sheehan, Cooper, & Einarsen, 2011;Hogh, Mikkelsen, & Hansen, 2011). These consequences include impaired mental health (Brousse et al, 2008;Hauge, Skogstad, & Einarsen, 2010), impaired somatic health (Kivimäki et al, 2003;Saastamoinen, Laaksonen, Leino-Arjas, & Lahelma, 2009), decreased job dedication and job satisfaction (Rodríguez-Muñoz, Baillien, De Witte, Moreno-Jiménez, & Pastor, 2009), and increased absenteeism (Kivimäki, Elovainio, & Vahtera, 2000) and intention to leave (Quine, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of detrimental outcomes has been shown to arise in the aftermath of bullying, for the individual target as well as at the organisational and societal level (Hoel, Sheehan, Cooper, & Einarsen, 2011;Hogh, Mikkelsen, & Hansen, 2011). These consequences include impaired mental health (Brousse et al, 2008;Hauge, Skogstad, & Einarsen, 2010), impaired somatic health (Kivimäki et al, 2003;Saastamoinen, Laaksonen, Leino-Arjas, & Lahelma, 2009), decreased job dedication and job satisfaction (Rodríguez-Muñoz, Baillien, De Witte, Moreno-Jiménez, & Pastor, 2009), and increased absenteeism (Kivimäki, Elovainio, & Vahtera, 2000) and intention to leave (Quine, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bullying also causing employees are less able to cope with daily duties cooperate with others (Einarsen, 2000), tend to withdraw, reluctant to communicate because they fear criticism and loss of morale (Field, 1996). Studies on the prevalence of workplace bullying have shown extensive consequences on Several levels on the individual level Several studies revealed dramatic consequences on victims, ranging from musculoskeletal complains to anxiety, insomnia and depression (Hogh, Mikkelsen & Hasen, 2011); on the organizational level there are Several costs like absenteeism, turnover and replacement, loss of motivation and productivity, amongst others (Hoel, Sheehan, Cooper & Einarsen, 2011). These arguments yielded the following hypothesis: (H1) workplace bullying negatively correlates with organizational citizenship behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, some studies have also shown that bullying witnesses reported higher stress and less job satisfaction than non-observers (e.g., 4) ). In addition, workplace bullying has also severe negative effects on the organization since it reduces productivity and increases counterproductive behaviors of the employees such as absenteeism, intent to leave the organization, turnover, earlier retirements and work-related accidents (e.g., [5][6][7] ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%