Organisational legitimacy beyond ethnicity? Shifting organisational logics in the struggle for immigrant rights in Los Angeles

Abstract

Immigrant political organisations in the United States have traditionally built political power by claiming to legitimately represent an ethnically defined group. However, the emergence of a number of multi-ethnic, class-based organisations over the last two decades has challenged this assumption, while raising questions about the ability of the institutional context to accommodate organisational change. Building on a neo-institutional theory of legitimacy, I examine the diverging legitimating strategies employed by two long-standing immigrant organisations based in Los Angeles (LA): the Korean Resource Center (KRC) and the Koreatown Immigrant Workers Alliance (KIWA). Through grant applications, organisational archival data and qualitative interviews, I show how KRC and KIWA, two groups embedded in the same sociopolitical context, have built unique yet equally successful legitimating accounts by adopting different organisational logics, one broadly based on ethnicity and one on class and multi-ethnicity. I suggest that KIWA and KRC's ideological differences, and their reliance on a different core of supporters -ethnic-oriented for KRC, labour-oriented for KIWA -drove the organisations towards distinct, yet partially overlapping subfields. By discursively mobilising those connections, and by actively shaping the surrounding organisational environment, both KRC and KIWA were able to incorporate in the broader non-profit advocacy sector in LA.ARTICLE HISTORY

Immigration blues: understanding market dynamics through consumer acculturation

“…This portrays how community trust is integral to intergroup cohesion and market development in a foreign cultural context. Previous research shows that ethnic entrepreneurs who seek to survive in a foreign market may cope with institutional structures at the surface level to gain legitimacy but challenge normative expectations within the same institutional field at a deeper level through their social linkages (Gnes 2016;Vermeulen and Brünger 2014). For example, the immigrant entrepreneurs did not question or dispute the regulations but instead concealed their incompetence from the Norwegian Food and Safety Authority.…”

Local Path Dependency and Scale Shift in Social Movements: The Case of the US Immigrant Rights Movement

“…CHIRLA experienced increased financial precarity in the early 2000s. The success of the organizational model prompted other organizations to adopt the same model and strategy (Gnes 2016). More organizations entered the local field, but the number of philanthropic foundations and public funders remained the same.…”

The contradictory field of community organizing in the United States: A theoretical framework

“…Organizations become aware of others through their networks, and they start to resemble one another as they adopt the attributes, practices, and cultures that seem to be succeeding (DiMaggio and Powell 1983). Gnes explains, “come to recognise certain organisational forms (or templates) along with their practices and discourses, as being natural within a given order of arrangements” (2016: 1422). Common relations, discourses, practices, and “rules of the game” make one organizational field distinctive from another.…”