Das Neue Am Neo-Institutionalismus 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-93008-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organisationswissenschaft mit Gesellschaft: der Neo-Institutionalismus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are many historical trajectories, which may influence corruption on the country level, we emphasized that the impact on the propensity to act corrupt depends on their institutional anchoring (Senge, 2006), the interaction of different institutional influences (Delmestri and Walgenbach, 2008), their field- and organization-specific embedding (Ashforth and Anand, 2003; Pohlmann, Höly and Klinkhammer, 2016), and the implementation of these patterns through gender-specific socialization (Alatas et al, 2009b) in the respective country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While there are many historical trajectories, which may influence corruption on the country level, we emphasized that the impact on the propensity to act corrupt depends on their institutional anchoring (Senge, 2006), the interaction of different institutional influences (Delmestri and Walgenbach, 2008), their field- and organization-specific embedding (Ashforth and Anand, 2003; Pohlmann, Höly and Klinkhammer, 2016), and the implementation of these patterns through gender-specific socialization (Alatas et al, 2009b) in the respective country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our hypotheses on the degree of institutionalization of corruption lean on historical processes, while our explanandum is the effect of these processes on corrupt decisions in Poland and Russia today. Following Luhmann (1996), Senge (2006) typified the degree of institutionalization in a temporal, social, and material dimension. The temporal dimension refers to the duration of an institution, the social dimension to its binding nature and the material dimension to its authoritativeness.…”
Section: An Institutional Approach Of Cultural Effects On Corrupt Pra...mentioning
confidence: 99%