2015
DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2015.1119873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organismic integration as a dynamic process: a systematic review of empirical studies on change in behavioral regulations in exercise in adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we first modeled change in exercise identity and exercise motivation over a period of 6 months. In line with recent findings on longitudinal changes in exercise motivation and the internalization processes proposed by SDT, we hypothesized an increase in the high self‐determined types of motivation (ie, intrinsic motivation, identified regulation) and a decrease in the low self‐determined types of motivation (ie, introjected and external regulation) and amotivation for the participants overtime. Based on previous findings showing increases in exercise identity over a 14‐week exercise class, we hypothesized increases in exercise identity over the study period among the exercisers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, we first modeled change in exercise identity and exercise motivation over a period of 6 months. In line with recent findings on longitudinal changes in exercise motivation and the internalization processes proposed by SDT, we hypothesized an increase in the high self‐determined types of motivation (ie, intrinsic motivation, identified regulation) and a decrease in the low self‐determined types of motivation (ie, introjected and external regulation) and amotivation for the participants overtime. Based on previous findings showing increases in exercise identity over a 14‐week exercise class, we hypothesized increases in exercise identity over the study period among the exercisers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Both types of motivation are self‐determined in nature and have been shown to be amenable to change in situations in which the social context is supportive of exercisers’ basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness . However, introjected regulation, the third type of motivation that was shown to be reciprocally related to exercise identity in our study, is a maladaptive form of motivation, as it represents motivation to act due to internal pressures and contingencies (although in the short term, this regulation has been found to be a positive predictor of behavioral engagement). Such contingencies are also captured in some of the exercise beliefs items of EIS (eg, “I need to exercise to feel good about myself”).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Even though previous training interventions have also found changes in autonomous motivation between baseline and four weeks [53], it would have been very interesting to investigate the longevity of the FL intervention with a follow-up at a later time (e.g., 1-2 months). Changes in boys' AM was not expected since others claim that changes in external motivation take a somewhat longer time, with the earliest changes detected six to eight weeks after the baseline [54]. Since the escalation in AM is exclusive to boys, we have argued that it is a result of the activity change from sport-oriented PE to more play-like PE.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In training interventions, autonomous regulations appear to increase over time, with increases being present already between the baseline and four weeks [53]. It appears that changes in external motivation take a somewhat longer time, with the earliest changes detected six to eight weeks after the baseline [54].…”
Section: Motivation In Pementioning
confidence: 98%
“…guilt, shame): instead of being pressurised to comply with norms, patients attempt to align introjected-related reasons to their beliefs and attitudes thereby compensating for the pressure to comply with norms and expectations, in the hope to making the internal sanctions inherent within introjected regulation bearable (i.e. pressure-free and balanced), when exercising (Wasserkampf & Kleinert, 2016 ). Although the moderate-controlled cluster type has been previously found among inactive individuals (Friederichs et al., 2015 ), further research is needed to determine exactly how introjected and identified regulations affect each other in obese patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%