2001
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.21-05-01663.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organization of Olivocerebellar Activity in the Absence of Excitatory Glutamatergic Input

Abstract: The olivocerebellar system has been proposed to function as a timing device for motor coordination in which inferior olivary neurons act as coupled oscillators that spontaneously generate rhythmic and synchronous activity. However, the inferior olive receives excitatory afferents, which can also drive the activity of these neurons. The extent to which the olivocerebellar system can intrinsically generate synchronous activity and olivary neurons act as neuronal oscillators has not been determined. To investigat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
84
2
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
10
84
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work on CSs in the cerebellar cortex has described zero-phase synchrony between PC pairs (26)(27)(28)(29). Our study extends these results to stable, nonzero-phase differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work on CSs in the cerebellar cortex has described zero-phase synchrony between PC pairs (26)(27)(28)(29). Our study extends these results to stable, nonzero-phase differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In this experiment, oscillation frequency was Ϸ8.6 Hz on all 15 electrodes that exhibit oscillatory activity. Across experiments (n ϭ 13), stable oscillation frequency was in the range of 4-11 Hz with 1 exception (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). Within each experiment, oscillation frequency was similar across electrodes, and occasional epochs of frequency deviation ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In fact, the density of neuronal gap junctions in the IO is one of the highest in the CNS (Belluardo et al 2000;Condorelli et al 1998;De Zeeuw et al 1995). Moreover, synchronous CS activity remains following block of excitatory and/or inhibitory input to the IO (Lang 2001(Lang , 2002, which, given the virtual lack of local chemical synaptic interactions between IO neurons, further implicates gap junction coupling as the origin of CS synchrony.…”
Section: Significance Of Uniform Olivocerebellar Conduction Time For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synchronous CS activity remains after block of major synaptic input to the IO, suggesting IO afferent activity is in fact not needed (Lang et al, 1996;Lang, 2001Lang, , 2002; subthreshold oscillations have never been reported in vivo (Crill and Kennedy, 1967;Crill, 1970;Llinás et al, 1974;Ruigrok and De Zeeuw, 1993;Ruigrok and Voogd, 1995); and autocorrelograms of rhythmic CS activity are not consistent with it arising from subthreshold oscillations (E. J. Lang, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%