from animal and human studies suggests that eropeptide Y (NPY) may be a potent endogenous .my tie. The anatomic structures mediating this action �fht peptide remain unknown. Furthermore, in addition �iIs anxiolytic-like effects, intracerebroventricular ""istration of NPY induces food intake through IIJpothalamic me chanisms, making the anxiolytic-like • of the peptide more difficult to interpret. The JI1JIOSi of this study was to examine the anatomic _rate for the effects of NPY on anxiety, and to _ferize the NPY receptors mediating these effects. lItrIctrebroventricular injection of NPY produced irrmse d food intake in free-feeding animals, and dose Itpmdent anticonflictlanxiolytic-like effects in an IIIbI ished animal model of anxiety, the Geller-Seifter Mlished by Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc.• Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010 punished responding test. In contrast, microinjection of NPY into the central nucleus of the amygdala did not increase food intake in free-feeding animals, did not affect unpunished lever pressing for food, but did reproduce the anticonflictlanxiolytic-like effect with high potency. The selective NPY-YI agonist, p[Leu 31 ,Pro 3 4]NPY was approximately equipotent with native NPY in the conflict paradigm, and markedly more potent than the Y2 agonist, NPY 13 -3 6. Intrastriatal injections had no effect on conflict behavior. Thus, activation of YI receptors in the central nucleus of the amygdala produces effects similar to established anxiolytics without affecting food intake, suggesting that YI-receptors in the amygdala may be a substrate for anxiolytic actions of NPY.