Organization of response areas in ferret primary auditory cortex

Abstract

1. We studied the topographic organization of the response areas obtained from single- and multiunit recordings along the isofrequency planes of the primary auditory cortex in the barbiturate-anesthetized ferret. 2. Using a two-tone stimulus, we determined the excitatory and inhibitory portions of the response areas and then parameterized them in terms of an asymmetry index. The index measures the balance of excitatory and inhibitory influences around the best frequency (BF). 3. The sensitivity of responses to the direction of a frequency-modulated (FM) tone was tested and found to correlate strongly with the asymmetry index of the response areas. Specifically, cells with strong inhibition from frequencies above the BF preferred upward sweeps, and those from frequencies below the BF preferred downward sweeps. 4. Responses to spectrally shaped noise were also consistent with the asymmetry of the response areas. For instance, cells that were strongly inhibited by frequencies higher than the BF responded best to stimuli that contained least spectral energy above the BF, i.e., stimuli with the opposite asymmetry. 5. Columnar organization of the response area types was demonstrated in 66 single units from 16 penetrations. Consistent with this finding, it was also shown that response area asymmetry measured from recordings of a cluster of cells corresponded closely with those measured from its single-unit constituents. Thus, in a local region, most cells exhibited similar response area types and other response features, e.g., FM directional sensitivity. 6. The distribution of the asymmetry index values along the isofrequency planes revealed systematic changes in the symmetry of the response areas. At the center, response areas with narrow and symmetric inhibitory sidebands predominated. These gave way to asymmetric inhibition, with high-frequency inhibition (relative to the BF) becoming more effective caudally and low-frequency inhibition more effective rostrally. These response types tended to cluster along repeated bands that paralleled the tonotopic axis. 7. Response features that correlated with the response area types were also mapped along the isofrequency planes. Thus, in four animals, a map of FM directional sensitivity was shown to be superimposed on the response area map. Similarly, it was demonstrated in six animals that the spectral gradient of the most effective noise stimulus varied systematically along the isofrequency planes. 8. One functional implication of the response area organization is that cortical responses encode the locally averaged gradient of the acoustic spectrum by their differential distribution along the isofrequency planes. This enhances the representation of such features as the symmetry of spectral peaks and edges and the spectral envelope.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Monopolar Intracochlear Pulse Trains Selectively Activate the Inferior Colliculus

“…This is the opposite of what would be expected from neuronal adaptation. One possible mechanism that is consistent with this narrowing of sustained responses could be lateral inhibition, which has been shown to be present at multiple levels of central auditory processing (Shamma et al 1993;Ramachandran et al 1999;Young 2003). One implication of this narrowing of sustained responses is that comparisons of psychophysical and electrophysiological measures (for example, ECAPs) in CI users should ideally be made using similar pulse rates.…”

Frequency preference and attention effects across cortical depths in the human primary auditory cortex

“…Using complex stimuli, such as dynamic ripples and natural sounds, it is possible to derive the neuronal population preference to spectrotemporal acoustic properties beyond frequency (39). Together with those stimuli, the methods used here can be exploited to investigate cortical depth stability or laminar variability of neuronal population tuning to other acoustic features, such as spectral and temporal modulations, aural dominance and binaural interaction, and frequency sweep direction (10,11,16). Finally, this study provides the basis for investigating neuronal population receptive field changes during increasingly complex auditory and multisensory tasks.…”

“…These anatomical observations of cortical microcolumns inspired invasive electrophysiological investigations in cats (7), demonstrating that frequency preference is constant across cortical depth (i.e., frequency columns). Since this early study, frequency columns have been observed in a variety of animals (3,(8)(9)(10), and a columnar organization has been suggested for other acoustic properties (10, 11). Despite this anatomical and physiological evidence from animal models, the role of cortical columns in auditory perception is not understood (6, 12, 13).…”

Cortical Responses to Cochlear Implant Stimulation: Channel Interactions

“…In the central nervous system, studies that use acoustic stimuli show interchannel interaction in the form of lateral (or twotone) inhibition. Two-tone inhibition has been demonstrated in the cochlear nucleus (e.g., Young 1998), the inferior colliculus (e.g., Ramachandran et al 1999), and the auditory cortex (e.g., Shamma et al 1993). In our studies, even the most restricted electrical stimuli (i.e., TP configuration) activate cortical regions as large as those activated in normalhearing guinea pigs by 1-octave-wide noise bands (Arenberg et al 2000;Bierer and Middlebrooks 2002;present study).…”