2016
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-802206-1.00013-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organization of the Globus Pallidus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The globus pallidus external segment (GPe) receives its two major inputs from STN and striatal iSPNs (Kita and Jaeger 2016). Interesting, however, all dSPNs projecting to the GPi appear to send axon collaterals to the GPe (Wu et al 2000).…”
Section: The Pallidal–subthalamic Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). The globus pallidus external segment (GPe) receives its two major inputs from STN and striatal iSPNs (Kita and Jaeger 2016). Interesting, however, all dSPNs projecting to the GPi appear to send axon collaterals to the GPe (Wu et al 2000).…”
Section: The Pallidal–subthalamic Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of GPe neurons are GABAergic projection neurons whose main targets are other basal ganglia nuclei (Kita and Jaeger 2016). The output from GPe involves distinct cell groups, that is, prototypical neurons with strong projections to the STN, and the so-called arkypallidal neurons projecting to both SPNs and striatal fast-spiking interneurons (Gittis et al 2014).…”
Section: The Pallidal–subthalamic Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BLeG parcellation instead divides the globus pallidus into three regions. But recent work suggests that the globus pallidus does, in fact, divide into three regions: the external segment, the lateral internal segment, and the medial internal segment (Kita, 2010). Gordon et al (2014) also previously showed increased within-parcel homogeneity of functional connectivity patterns for their parcellation compared to spatially randomized variants of it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 662 instantaneous phase of each population was estimated by applying the Hilbert transform 663 to the average somatic membrane voltage of cells in the population, after band-pass 664 filtering using a neutral-phase filter (Butterworth filter, 4th order, command sosfiltfilt) 665 in an 8 Hz wide frequency band centered on the dominant oscillation frequency. For 666 populations that were modeled as surrogate spike trains (cortex and striatum), artificial 667 membrane voltage signals were first constructed by convolving the spike trains with a [46,47] proximal [15] GPe 57 [93] 883 [94] proximal [95] depression [93] 4 ms [96] strengthened [92] prolonged decay [74] GPe GPe proximal,somatic [49,97] depression [82] strengthened [82] STN 135 [98] dendritic,distal [99] facilitation, 2 ms [100] strengthened [78] depression [51] MSN 10622 [98] dendritic, distal [49] facilitation [82] 5 ms [100] Table 2. STN model intrinsic current equations from Gillies and Willshaw [43].…”
Section: Signal Analysis 657mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-4.3). Cortical patterning of neural activity in the STN-GPe network via the 97 hyperdirect pathway was then investigated by modeling cortical input to the STN 98 inputs as periodically bursting spike trains. To investigate whether changing the 99 excitation-inhibition balance in STN and GPe contributed to changes in spontaneous 100 synchronization and functional coupling between nuclei, we shifted the ratio of 101 excitation and inhibition by systematically altering the strength of individual 102 projections between nuclei.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%