2016
DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2016.00082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organization of the Zone of Transition between the Pretectum and the Thalamus, with Emphasis on the Pretectothalamic Lamina

Abstract: The zone of transition between the pretectum, derived from prosomere 1, and the thalamus, derived from prosomere 2, is structurally complex and its understanding has been hampered by cytoarchitectural and terminological confusion. Herein, using a battery of complementary morphological approaches, including cytoarchitecture, myeloarchitecture and the expression of molecular markers, we pinpoint the features or combination of features that best characterize each nucleus of the pretectothalamic transitional zone … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(197 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent exhaustive report of the cytoarchitecture and neurochemistry of the pretecto‐thalamic transition zone, Márquez‐Legorreta, Horta‐Júnior, Berrebi and Saldaña () identify the pretectothalamic lamina as the border that separates several posterior thalamic structures, including the medial division of the MGB, the suprageniculate and ethmoid nuclei, from the anterior pretectal nucleus. The band formed by the Pul‐T cells is located dorsally and caudally to the pretectothalamic lamina, and may constitute an extension to visual areas of the border formed by the pretectothalamic lamina, which surrounds mainly auditory nuclei (Márquez‐Legorreta et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent exhaustive report of the cytoarchitecture and neurochemistry of the pretecto‐thalamic transition zone, Márquez‐Legorreta, Horta‐Júnior, Berrebi and Saldaña () identify the pretectothalamic lamina as the border that separates several posterior thalamic structures, including the medial division of the MGB, the suprageniculate and ethmoid nuclei, from the anterior pretectal nucleus. The band formed by the Pul‐T cells is located dorsally and caudally to the pretectothalamic lamina, and may constitute an extension to visual areas of the border formed by the pretectothalamic lamina, which surrounds mainly auditory nuclei (Márquez‐Legorreta et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linke and colleagues (Linke, ; Linke et al, ; Linke & Schwegler, ) agreed with this scheme with the exception of the exact positions of MGM relative to PIN. Subsequent additional cytoarchitecture, myeloarchitecture and molecular marker evidence (Marquez‐Legorreta et al, ) further modified these positions. Figure a illustrates these differences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The medial division of the medial geniculate (MGM) and the posterior intralaminar nucleus (PIN) also known as PIL (Paxinos & Watson, ) are situated immediately medial to the ventral division of the medial geniculate (MGV) and ventral to the boundary between MGV and the dorsal division of the medial geniculate (MGD). Although there are disagreements as to their exact borders relative to one another in the rat (see Bordi & LeDoux, , ; Lanuza, Moncho‐Bogani, & Ledoux, ; Linke, ; Linke & Schwegler, ; Marquez‐Legorreta et al, ) both MGM and PIN are classified as association nuclei of the acoustic thalamus (Ledoux, Ruggiero, Forest, Stornetta, & Reis, ; Winer & Morest, ; Winer, Morest, & Diamond, ). Regardless of these boundary disagreements, there are several common anatomical and physiological features linking cells in this region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The division between MGm and the suprageniculate nucleus (Sg) was approximated in figures, but their cell counts were combined, as definitive borders between the two divisions were ambiguous in these preparations, and because transcript distributions were typically uniform across the region. The difficulties in delineation of Sg in mouse have been noted previously, (Jones, ; Watson et al, ), and identification varies across studies (Cruikshank et al, ; Anderson et al, ; Lu et al, ; Anderson and Linden, ; Marquez‐Legorreta et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The difficulties in delineation of Sg in mouse have been noted previously, Abbreviations: ms, mouse; rb, rabbit; G/g, goat, Ch, chicken. (Jones, 2007;Watson et al, 2012), and identification varies across studies (Cruikshank et al, 2001;Anderson et al, 2009;Lu et al, 2009;Anderson and Linden, 2011;Marquez-Legorreta et al, 2016).…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%