1991
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.11-01-00168.1991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques

Abstract: It has been proposed that visual information in the extrastriate cortex is conveyed along 2 major processing pathways, a “dorsal” pathway directed to the posterior parietal cortex, underlying spatial vision, and a “ventral” pathway directed to the inferior temporal cortex, underlying object vision. To determine the relative distributions of cells projecting to the 2 pathways, we injected the posterior parietal and inferior temporal cortex with different fluorescent tracers in 5 rhesus monkeys. The parietal inj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
365
1
5

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 563 publications
(407 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(140 reference statements)
36
365
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These and other findings (for review, see (27)) suggest that visuomotor systems may be more sensitive to stimuli in the visual periphery than the perceptual systems mediating our experience of the visual world beyond the fovea. These behavioural observations in humans are consistent with anatomical and electrophysiological studies in the monkey showing that areas in the dorsal stream receive extensive inputs from the peripheral visual fields while inputs to the ventral stream are largely from more central regions of the visual field (for review, see (2,12)). The difference in representation of the visual field might explain why the visual control of grasping movements directed at targets in the visual periphery is so much more reliable than perceptual judgements about those same objects; in short, the dorsal action is simply better connected with the visual periphery than the ventral perception system.…”
Section: Perception and Visuomotor Control In The Peripherysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These and other findings (for review, see (27)) suggest that visuomotor systems may be more sensitive to stimuli in the visual periphery than the perceptual systems mediating our experience of the visual world beyond the fovea. These behavioural observations in humans are consistent with anatomical and electrophysiological studies in the monkey showing that areas in the dorsal stream receive extensive inputs from the peripheral visual fields while inputs to the ventral stream are largely from more central regions of the visual field (for review, see (2,12)). The difference in representation of the visual field might explain why the visual control of grasping movements directed at targets in the visual periphery is so much more reliable than perceptual judgements about those same objects; in short, the dorsal action is simply better connected with the visual periphery than the ventral perception system.…”
Section: Perception and Visuomotor Control In The Peripherysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The density of projections decreases at earlier stages of the hierarchy, which parallels our observation of a reduced prevalence of remapping at earlier stages. Alternatively, remapping of visual signals may take place initially in parietal cortex and the remapping we observe in extrastriate cortex may reflect the influence of back projections from LIP (7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Area V3A provides a major input to LIP and receives reciprocal projections from it (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Area LIP is also reciprocally connected with the FEF (11,12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual pathways project by a number of cortico-cortical stages from the primary visual cortex until they reach the temporal lobe visual cortical areas (Baizer et al 1991;Maunsell and Newsome 1987;Seltzer and Pandya 1978), in which some neurons that respond selectively to faces are found (Bruce et al 1981;Desimone 1991;Desimone and Gross 1979;Desimone et al 1984;Gross et al 1985;Perrett et al 1982;Rolls 1981Rolls , 1984Rolls , 1991Rolls , 1992aRolls , 2000aRolls , 2005Rolls , 2006Rolls and Deco 2002). The inferior temporal visual cortex, area TE, is divided on the basis of cytoarchitecture, myeloarchitecture, and afferent input into areas TEa, TEm, TE3, TE2, and TE1.…”
Section: Neuronal Responses Found In Different Temporal Lobe Cortex Vmentioning
confidence: 99%