Organizational and structural reform in aged care organizations: empowerment towards a change process

Abstract

Aims The aims were first to explore strategies for both structural and organizational reform by the process of action research, and second to use collective self‐inquiry by all study participants as a way of examining problems and deciding on actions to bring about change. Rationale It was hoped that this process would empower the staff, aged residents and family members to own and therefore be meaningfully involved in improving practice and care standards. Background/introduction Three aged care centres expressed a desire to enhance the quality of care provided in order to meet the criteria for accreditation. They wanted to participate in a process that would assist them in critically examining their resource allocation, service delivery patterns and outcomes for residents. Research methods Original data were collected in three different aged care facilities over a three‐year period from 1996 to 1998 in order to seek answers to the usefulness of action research in the change process. The methodology included participant observation, interviews and focus group discussions with all participants. Results/findings Organizational change occurred across the three centres with subsequent changes in the outcomes for both residents and staff. The themes which emerged from the data analysis process and which enhanced the participatory process included the need for flattened organizational structures and management's willingness to fully support the process and to be more transparent. The factors that inhibited the process included the organizational culture and tokenistic support by management. Discussion/conclusion Participatory action research was found to be a successful process for identifying and acting on the enhancers and inhibitors to structural and organizational reform.

Guiding design of dementia friendly environments in residential care settings: Considering the living experiences

“…Redistributing authority and responsibility with a flattened organisational structure empowers direct care staff to respond more effectively to residents' needs (Chenoweth & Kilstoff, 2002). Flexible management structures have proved to be successful in generating dementia friendly environments for people with dementia (Cohen-Mansfield & Bester, 2006;Rabig, Thomas, Kane, Cutler, & McAlilly, 2006).…”

Leading change: a challenge for leaders in Nordic health care

“…Mid‐level leaders often do not themselves initiate organizational change but are given the task of implementing such change; they are responsible for getting personnel to engage in the change process in a positive manner (cf. Chenoweth & Kilstoff 2002, Mathena 2002). Personnel’s attitudes towards organizational change are therefore extremely important and are dependent on leaders’ ability to lead change.…”

Multi‐faceted palliative care intervention: aged care nurses’ and care assistants’ perceptions and experiences

“…This suggests that aged care providers need to be engaged as partners in participative processes and employ pragmatic strategies to collaboratively develop approaches for addressing these deficiencies (Earl‐Slater 2002, Froggatt & Payne 2006, Partington 2006). The heterogeneity of these barriers, combined with the complexity of the aged care setting, dictates that a comprehensive multi‐level approach to change is required (Chenoweth & Kilstoff 2002, Ferlie & Shortell 2001).…”