DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-13419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational change: extension staff response to increase programming for at-risk audiences

Abstract: This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer.The quality of this reproduction Is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is significant not only for the agricultural industry but for Cooperative Extension. Hassel (2004), Klemme et al (2005), and Thering (2009) have all noted that barriers formed by culture, class, ethnicity, race, and/or language differences impede partnerships with underserved groups. As this study has demonstrated, cultural and linguistic responsiveness is an essential program component that facilitates Extension collaborations with underserved audiences and ensures effective agricultural education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is significant not only for the agricultural industry but for Cooperative Extension. Hassel (2004), Klemme et al (2005), and Thering (2009) have all noted that barriers formed by culture, class, ethnicity, race, and/or language differences impede partnerships with underserved groups. As this study has demonstrated, cultural and linguistic responsiveness is an essential program component that facilitates Extension collaborations with underserved audiences and ensures effective agricultural education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frierson et al's (2010) and Bryson and Patton's (2010) arguments are relevant to university Extension programs which, generally, have been critiqued for their structural barriers to partnerships with underserved groups (e.g. Hassel, 2004;Klemme, Hausafus, & Shirer, 2005). Thering (2009) adds that in both program development and evaluation processes, Extension professionals must increasingly identify and overcome a spectrum of barriers formed by culture, class, ethnicity, race, and/or language if they are to produce intended educational and community capacity building outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%