Organizational change readiness practices of business turnaround change agents

Abstract

This paper summarizes the findings of an investigation of 145 business turnaround change agents (TCAs) to determine (a) the period of time expected to improve the performance of failing companies; (b) the extent of fear of job loss and resistance to change by managers in these companies; and (c) the readiness practices employed by TCAs in preparing managers for the organizational changes necessary to effect business turnarounds. These TCAs indicated that they expected to reverse a negative cash flow in 60 days and to generate a profit in an additional 150 days. Furthermore, target group members feared job loss but paradoxically resisted organizational changes. Additionally, TCAs primarily employed personal readiness interventions including involving target group members. The implications of these findings and future research directions are discussed. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and Cornwallis Emmanuel Ltd.

Explaining Employee Engagement with Strategic Change Implementation: A Meaning-Making Approach

“…Employees using a strategy worldview construct meaning about why things are changing and thus "self-mitigate" the uncertainties that challenge commitment during change (Armenakis and Fredenberger 1997). This prediction is also consistent with previous research that has found that forming a strategic vision and sharing it with employees increases affective commitment through the ownership it creates among employees (Dvir et al 2004).…”

“…For example, scholars have examined how organizational members can adapt to change (e.g., Fugate et al 2002, Judge et al 1999, Kelman 2005, Self et al 2007, Smollan 2006 and are capable of being open to, or ready for, change (e.g., Armenakis and Fredenberger 1997, Herold et al 2007, Morrison and Phelps 1999, Wanberg and Banas 2000. To a large extent, this research focuses on a set of dispositional and contextual antecedents that can facilitate employee engagement with change, and not the interpretive variety in reactions to change.…”

Innovative Potential Of The Personnel In The Organization

“…American researchers Armenakis and Fredenberger (1997), considering the aspect of the development of adaptability and personnel readiness for changes, identified three strategies for successfully forming psychological readiness for changes:…”

There is no such thing as a crisis: A critique of and alterative to the dominant crisis management model

“…Once the crisis‐as‐event model selects that focus, it engages in analysis of that event, asking questions including but not limited to: Is the event internal—say, a product failure resulting from a flawed product development process—or external—say, an environmental disturbance—to the unit? (Armenakis & Fredenberger, ). If the event is external, is its source political, social, economic, or natural? (Brockner & James, ; Falkheimer & Heide, ). Does the event pose a threat, an opportunity, or some combination of the two?…”