1997
DOI: 10.5465/257028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Configurations And Performance: A Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
140
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
140
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…JD-R studies have demonstrated how the good health of an employee facilitates performance at the organisational level as employees who create their own resources are better able to deal with their job demands and to achieve their work goals Hakanen, 2009;Salanova, Agut & Peiro, 2005;Salanova & Schaufeli, 2008). Similarly, job design research has found evidence for the relationship between job characteristics, such as those outlined in the above propositions, and organisational outcomes such as worker compensation (Morgeson & Humphrey, 2006), training demands (Campion, 1988), skill requirements (Capelli & Rogovsky, 1994) and organisational performance (Ketchen et al, 1997). Lean manufacturing has also been repeatedly associated with improved organisational performance and competitive advantage (Brown et al, 2006;Cua et al, 2001;Fullerton & Wempe, 2009).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JD-R studies have demonstrated how the good health of an employee facilitates performance at the organisational level as employees who create their own resources are better able to deal with their job demands and to achieve their work goals Hakanen, 2009;Salanova, Agut & Peiro, 2005;Salanova & Schaufeli, 2008). Similarly, job design research has found evidence for the relationship between job characteristics, such as those outlined in the above propositions, and organisational outcomes such as worker compensation (Morgeson & Humphrey, 2006), training demands (Campion, 1988), skill requirements (Capelli & Rogovsky, 1994) and organisational performance (Ketchen et al, 1997). Lean manufacturing has also been repeatedly associated with improved organisational performance and competitive advantage (Brown et al, 2006;Cua et al, 2001;Fullerton & Wempe, 2009).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stewardship and stakeholder theory remove some restrictive assumptions of the agency approach, yet do not provide a comprehensive research framework that links corporate governance with the broader context of different organizational environments. Rather, most corporate governance research continues to view organizational outcomes in a 'context free' or universal manner, rather than based on how different organizational environments mediate hypothesized relationships between sets of corporate governance practices and organizational outcomes, such as effectiveness, efficiency, or performance (Ketchen et al 1997). However, Jensen and Warner (1988, p.21) suggest in an article widely cited in financial economics that, "ownership, voting structure, capital structure, and managerial discretion interact with internal organizational forces and affect corporate behavior in important ways".…”
Section: From Universalism To Diverse Organizational Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite considerable research effort, the empirical findings on this causal link have been mixed and inconclusive. For example, empirical studies of the effects of board composition and ownership structure on financial performance have failed to identify any consistently significant effects (Ketchen et al 1997;Dalton et al 2003;Deutsch 2005). Critiques of agency theory have pointed out its 'under-contextualized' nature and hence its inability to accurately compare and explain the diversity of corporate governance arrangements across different institutional contexts (Aguilera and Jackson 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a meta-analysis of 32 studies (including many strategic groups studies), Ketchen et al (1997) found that eight percent of the performance variance among firms can be attributed to 'configuration' membership. Nair and Kotha (2001) provide further evidence from the Japanese steel industry.…”
Section: Strategic Groups and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, research on the major contingencies that shape the nature and strength of between-group performance differences is needed. Also, given that Ketchen et al's (1997) meta-analysis included only studies through 1994, perhaps the time is right for another meta-analysis.…”
Section: Multipoint Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%