2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10730-005-4283-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational ethics and social justice in practice: Choices and challenges in a rural-urban health region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conjunction with the Politics of Difference, Young's Social Connection Model proposes that the same structure which creates inequalities for certain groups can simultaneously advance the opportunities and influence of other groups [81]. This highlighting of structural inequalities Multiple Statuses: (tally statuses below) [115][116][117][118][119] Poverty [120,121] Intellectual Disability [122,123] Physical Disability [124,125] Chronic Health & Chronic Mental Health [126,127] Addiction, including Neonatal Abstinence [128,129] Lifelong Caregiver [130,131] Foster Experience [132,133] Indigenous/ Aboriginal [134,135] Survivor of Abuse [136,137] Victim of Crime [138,139] Incarceration [140,141] Homelessness or Street/Shelter Experience [142,143] Race [144,145] Rural or Isolated Geography [146,147] Ageism: Children & Seniors [148] Gender [149,150] Hayvon International Journal for Equity in Health (2024) 23:106 is complemented by Young's argument for Five Faces of Oppression, which categorizes inequalities into: economic exploitation, socio-economic marginalization, powerlessness over one's work, cultural imperialism, and systematic violence [55]. In combination, Young's theories of social justice informs the synthesis of constructs number 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8.…”
Section: Results Of Individual Sources Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conjunction with the Politics of Difference, Young's Social Connection Model proposes that the same structure which creates inequalities for certain groups can simultaneously advance the opportunities and influence of other groups [81]. This highlighting of structural inequalities Multiple Statuses: (tally statuses below) [115][116][117][118][119] Poverty [120,121] Intellectual Disability [122,123] Physical Disability [124,125] Chronic Health & Chronic Mental Health [126,127] Addiction, including Neonatal Abstinence [128,129] Lifelong Caregiver [130,131] Foster Experience [132,133] Indigenous/ Aboriginal [134,135] Survivor of Abuse [136,137] Victim of Crime [138,139] Incarceration [140,141] Homelessness or Street/Shelter Experience [142,143] Race [144,145] Rural or Isolated Geography [146,147] Ageism: Children & Seniors [148] Gender [149,150] Hayvon International Journal for Equity in Health (2024) 23:106 is complemented by Young's argument for Five Faces of Oppression, which categorizes inequalities into: economic exploitation, socio-economic marginalization, powerlessness over one's work, cultural imperialism, and systematic violence [55]. In combination, Young's theories of social justice informs the synthesis of constructs number 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8.…”
Section: Results Of Individual Sources Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though we limited our findings to U.S.-focused publications, the search identified many non-U.S. rural ethics articles, particularly those exploring ethics issues in England, Canada, and Australia, which are of value to discussions of ethics issues in rural U.S. settings. For example, the journal HEC Forum published a useful series of articles in a 2004 issue focusing on ethics issues and committees in Canada (see notes [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%