2019
DOI: 10.1177/1096348019883694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Ethnic Diversity’s Influence on Hotel Employees’ Satisfaction, Commitment, and Turnover Intention: Gender’s Moderating Role

Abstract: The aim of this study was to explore whether Taiwanese hospitality workers’ gender moderates the relationship between perceived ethnic diversity levels within their workplace and work-related outcomes at an individual employee level. Data were collected from 371 employees across 26 hotels in Taiwan. The results supported mediation effects of job satisfaction and affective commitment on the relationship between perceived ethnic diversity and employees’ turnover intention. Gender moderated the relationships betw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, along with classifying and revealing the mediating role of job insecurity in this study, further studies should investigate whether there are more paths or mechanisms of COVID-19 event strength, which may influence the turnover intention of hotel employees. In addition, different from the factors influencing the turnover intention of employees examined in the previous studies, including organizational ( Hsiao et al, 2020 ; Jung & Yoon, 2013 ), management ( Gordon et al, 2018 ; Jang & Kandampully, 2017 ), and employee personal factors ( Karatepe & Karadas, 2014 ; Tongchaiprasit & Ariyabuddhiphongs, 2016 ), we explored the impact of COVID-19 event strength, an external and environmental stimulating factor, on the turnover intention of hotel employees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, along with classifying and revealing the mediating role of job insecurity in this study, further studies should investigate whether there are more paths or mechanisms of COVID-19 event strength, which may influence the turnover intention of hotel employees. In addition, different from the factors influencing the turnover intention of employees examined in the previous studies, including organizational ( Hsiao et al, 2020 ; Jung & Yoon, 2013 ), management ( Gordon et al, 2018 ; Jang & Kandampully, 2017 ), and employee personal factors ( Karatepe & Karadas, 2014 ; Tongchaiprasit & Ariyabuddhiphongs, 2016 ), we explored the impact of COVID-19 event strength, an external and environmental stimulating factor, on the turnover intention of hotel employees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, due to mixed inferences, turnover intention resulting from either job insecurity or perceived operating performance might differ between large- and other-sized hotels. Moreover, hotel size significantly impacts job satisfaction ( Frye & Mount, 2007 ) and hotel performance ( Kim et al, 2013 ), which are the prerequisite for turnover ( Ferreira et al, 2017 ; Hsiao et al, 2020 ; Tongchaiprasit & Ariyabuddhiphongs, 2016 ; Zopiatis et al, 2014 ). Kim et al (2013) have also confirmed the moderating effect of hotel size.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, there is a need to study voice and silence processes in employees from traditionally underrepresented (e.g., Kong & Jolly, 2019) and understudied (e.g., Hsiao et al, 2020) groups. Given the international scope of hospitality research, the diversity of the United States and global hospitality workforces (Jolly & Self, 2020; Madera et al, 2018), and the wide variety of sectors encompassed by the industry, it would seem that hospitality researchers are well positioned to make significant future contributions to the understanding of basic psychological needs, their antecedents, and their outcomes in the workplace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common method variance is a systematic error variance among variables (Williams & Brown, 1994 ) and refers to a type of deviation that is caused by similarity in methods used to collect data (Hsiao et al, 2020 ). As per Podsakoff et al ( 2003 ), we carried out exploratory factor analysis (EFA) for all the items using a rotation‐free principal component analysis method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%