2008
DOI: 10.1108/10569210810907155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational factors affecting supply chains in developing countries

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide managers of multinational companies and researchers with a framework for investigating and effectively managing organizational factors and supply‐chain networks in lieu of conditions prevalent in developing countries.Design/methodology/approachThis paper draws from the international management, supply‐chain management, and organizational behavior literature to construct a framework and formulate propositions linking important organizational factors to supply‐chain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EM penetration intensity may increase the exposure of a firm to SC disruptions for many reasons. First, infrastructure in many EMs is either poor or fledging as demonstrated by meager transportation systems, inadequate warehousing facilities, and low‐quality or congested ports (Babbar et al., 2008; Prasad et al., 2005; Lorentz et al., 2013; Ruamsook et al., 2007), resulting in increased exposure to SC disruptions. In addition, deficient technological infrastructure (Prasad and Tata, 2010; Lorentz et al., 2013) and the limited use of advanced supply chain management (SCM) systems make visibility and traceability of SC activities difficult.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…EM penetration intensity may increase the exposure of a firm to SC disruptions for many reasons. First, infrastructure in many EMs is either poor or fledging as demonstrated by meager transportation systems, inadequate warehousing facilities, and low‐quality or congested ports (Babbar et al., 2008; Prasad et al., 2005; Lorentz et al., 2013; Ruamsook et al., 2007), resulting in increased exposure to SC disruptions. In addition, deficient technological infrastructure (Prasad and Tata, 2010; Lorentz et al., 2013) and the limited use of advanced supply chain management (SCM) systems make visibility and traceability of SC activities difficult.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, poor institutional infrastructure (e.g., legislation, regulations, policies, and the implementation and enforcement of rules and regulations) adds to risks of opportunistic behaviors and hinders compliance to contractual policies (Marquis and Raynard, 2015; Child and Lu, 1996). Third, EM partners (i.e., customers and suppliers) may be less reliable than domestic suppliers due to differences in business rules, standards, and business cultures (Babbar et al., 2008; Cook, 2007; Pagell et al., 2005; Hitt et al., 2000). Thus, a broad hypothesis is that there is a positive relationship between EM penetration intensity and product recalls.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It reduces operating costs and helps in interorganizational collaboration (Dong, Xu, & Zhu, 2009;Lewis & Talalayevsky, 2004;Rai & Tang, 2010;Sanders, 2007;Sherer, 2005;Spiegel, 2001). Earlier research on adoption of technology in Indian supply chains have focused on integration, information sharing, and strategic decision making (Babbar et al, 2008;Jharkharia & Shanker, 2004;Khan et al, 2009;Rahman, 2004;Saad & Patel, 2006;Thakkar et al, 2008). Sezen (2008) in his research discussed supply chain information sharing, integration, and design in 125 manufacturing companies in Turkey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We focused the study only on the use of mobile phones/technology for sharing information, as there has been no research in India to understand the application of mobile technology in facilitating information flow among supply chain partners. There have been several research documents discussing the growing adoption of technology in different Indian manufacturing and supply chain sectors (Babbar, Addae, Gosen, & Prasad, 2008;Jharkharia & Shanker, 2004Khan et al, 2009;Kannabiran & Bhaumik, 2005;Rahman, 2004;Saad & Patel, 2006;Sahay, Cavale, & Mohan, 2003;Sahay, Gupta, & Mohan, 2006;Thakkar, Kanda, & Deshmukh, 2008). We studied the level of mobile technology adoption and usage in the Indian retail sector for four supply chain components: supply chain integration, supply chain design, information sharing with customers, and information sharing with suppliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%