“…The one-factor CFA model has a relatively very poor fit to the data (χ 2 = 7,059.89, df = 527, TLI = .560, NFI = .593, CFI = .610, RMSEA = .135), which suggests that there is little probability of common method bias. Second, we performed the more stringent unmeasured latent method factor technique (Andrews & Mostafa, 2019; Cole, Bedeian, & Bruch, 2011), which adds a latent common methods factor to the measurement model. This model showed a good fit to the observed data (χ 2 = 1,675.04, df = 478, TLI = .911, NFI = .904, CFI = .929, RMSEA = .061).…”