2000
DOI: 10.15760/etd.778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational innovation in a professional school: a case study

Abstract: Post-treatment data indicated no significant change in collaboration, communication, role clarity, or trust, concern, and individuality behaviors. The conclusions drawn were that the organization development strategies had little impact on improving organizational effectiveness. The fact that none of the hypotheses were supported does not mean that OD has no value for professional schools, but may be due to the inadequacy of the instruments used. It was further suggested that the time actually spent on interve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This increased time to develop and sustain behaviors is supported by Berger's (1981) research which suggests that time actually spent on organizational behavior interventions may be a factor in sustaining behaviors. These groups received two hours of feedback using the field diagrams, in contrast with the other groups, which received none.…”
Section: In Addition To Organization Behavior and Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This increased time to develop and sustain behaviors is supported by Berger's (1981) research which suggests that time actually spent on organizational behavior interventions may be a factor in sustaining behaviors. These groups received two hours of feedback using the field diagrams, in contrast with the other groups, which received none.…”
Section: In Addition To Organization Behavior and Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…(Mill, 1971) The notion of introducing feedback into the group process (also called "intervention") has intrigued researchers over the years (Gibb, 1967;McCaskey, 1976). Berger (1981) introduced into a series of small working groups a survey feedback model for the purpose of increasing trust behavior. Feedback to small groups about their behavior was also utilized by Bales in his early work to enhance the growth and development of groups (Bales, 1956).…”
Section: Identified Area For Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sindhu (2011) suggests that employer branding is the process of managing reputation and image to attract and retain employees. Similarly, a study by Berger and Berger (2004) defines it as the process of creating, communicating, and delivering a unique value proposition as an employer to target employee groups. Furthermore, Ahmed et al (2022) defines employer branding as the process of creating a unique identity and reputation for an organization as an employer, which will help the organization to attract, retain and engage the best talent.…”
Section: Employer Brandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition highlights the emphasis on identifying, attracting and retaining top talent for the organization. Another definition of talent marketing is the process of creating, communicating and delivering a unique value proposition to target employee groups (Berger and Berger, 2004). This definition emphasizes the importance of creating and communicating a unique value proposition to potential employees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition highlights the emphasis on identifying, attracting and retaining top talent for the organization. Another definition of talent marketing is the process of creating, communicating and delivering a unique value proposition to target employee groups (Berger and Berger, 2004). This definition emphasizes the importance of creating and communicating a unique value proposition to potential employees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%