1968
DOI: 10.2307/2092683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Interdependence and Intra-Organizational Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
415
0
13

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 752 publications
(436 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
415
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the firm's resource dependency leads to the relationship (cf. Aiken and Hage, 1968;Pfeffer and Salancik, 1978). Following the same logic, for the counterpart in the relationship to engage, firms must also have a degree of dependence on resources, such as financial incentives.…”
Section: Power and Dependence Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the firm's resource dependency leads to the relationship (cf. Aiken and Hage, 1968;Pfeffer and Salancik, 1978). Following the same logic, for the counterpart in the relationship to engage, firms must also have a degree of dependence on resources, such as financial incentives.…”
Section: Power and Dependence Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By entering into interorganizational relationships, organizations can get access to complementary resources (Aiken andHage 1968, Van de Ven 1976), enabling, for example, complex innovations (Dhanaraj andParkhe 2006, Powell et al 1996). The embeddedness in networks also constitutes a resource in itself (Gulati 2007): a firm's existing network position and its past alliances influence subsequent relations, because previous experiences create ties that provide opportunities for future collaboration (Gulati and Gargiulo 1999, Powell et al 2005, Uzzi 1997.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambidexterity was assessed using the 12-item scale measure and 5-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) that was developed by Lubatkin et al (2006). In addition, contradictory organizational characteristics that consist of decentralization, formalization, and connectedness were measured by scales that were developed by Tanenbaum and Schmidt (1973), Aiken and Hage (1968) and, Jaworski and Kohli (1993) in turns. These measures were assessed with 5-point Likert scales ranging from 1-strongly disagree to 5-strongly agree.…”
Section: Sample and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%