2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12939-016-0459-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational interventions improving access to community-based primary health care for vulnerable populations: a scoping review

Abstract: Access to community-based primary health care (hereafter, ‘primary care’) is a priority in many countries. Health care systems have emphasized policies that help the community ‘get the right service in the right place at the right time’. However, little is known about organizational interventions in primary care that are aimed to improve access for populations in situations of vulnerability (e.g., socioeconomically disadvantaged) and how successful they are. The purpose of this scoping review was to map the ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
69
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A scoping literature review concluded that access to community-based primary healthcare can be improved for vulnerable populations by a formal integration of services, while also reducing hospitalizations, emergency department admissions, and unmet healthcare needs [15]. Another recent review concluded that integrated care improved access to care for older people, and quality of care [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scoping literature review concluded that access to community-based primary healthcare can be improved for vulnerable populations by a formal integration of services, while also reducing hospitalizations, emergency department admissions, and unmet healthcare needs [15]. Another recent review concluded that integrated care improved access to care for older people, and quality of care [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All included studies were published between 2002 and July 2019. We identified 8 reviews [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] and 59 empirical studies [8,. The vast majority of these studies were conducted in high income countries (82%), used a mixture of methods (predominantly quantitative (66%)) and were conducted across multiple settings, with the majority (49%) in secondary care settings.…”
Section: Description Of General Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 7 studies, no factors were identified [31,34,50,58,65,78,81] and in two, it was unclear [44]. Most studies reporting factors, discussed multiple individual factors (range = 1-7, average = 2.3) across multiple domains (range = 1-4, average = 2.0).…”
Section: Description Of Contributory/associated Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facilitators of access to healthcare services include the availability of the service, the approachability of staff and its affordability (Khanassov et al. ). The location of the service accentuates availability, and health services targeted towards homeless people are often located in residential hostels or other contexts close to the population being served, frequently adopting open‐door policies and treatment drop‐in to enhance access (Keogh et al.…”
Section: Homelessness and Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurses have a key role in the organization and provision of available, approachable and affordable care (Khanassov et al. ; Savage et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%