2021
DOI: 10.3390/soc11040143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Justice and Workplace Bullying: Lessons Learned from Externally Referred Complaints and Investigations

Abstract: Workplace bullying is a serious psychosocial risk which, when poorly managed, results in detrimental outcomes for individuals, organizations, and society. Some of the most common strategies for addressing bullying within the workplace centre on attempts to document and contextualise the bullying situation—that is, the internal complaint and investigation process. Scholarly inquiries of these investigative mechanisms, however, are limited, and most have neglected the influence of organisational justice as an un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While some identified bullying as a consequence of injustice (e.g., [70,71]), others have looked at justice as a buffer protecting bullying victims from negative well-being (e.g., [72]). In a recent study of 280 cases, Neall, Li, and Tuckey [73] could add another perspective to this debate: from formally reported bullying, they saw that this-by the target described events of low justice in response to their several complaints as part of a bullying case-fueled further escalation of the bullying and its consequences for these targets. From this and looking at our own results, we might consider the idea that employees yield a qualitatively different interpretation of and focus on their work context, depending on which exposure group they belong to, molding our observed effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some identified bullying as a consequence of injustice (e.g., [70,71]), others have looked at justice as a buffer protecting bullying victims from negative well-being (e.g., [72]). In a recent study of 280 cases, Neall, Li, and Tuckey [73] could add another perspective to this debate: from formally reported bullying, they saw that this-by the target described events of low justice in response to their several complaints as part of a bullying case-fueled further escalation of the bullying and its consequences for these targets. From this and looking at our own results, we might consider the idea that employees yield a qualitatively different interpretation of and focus on their work context, depending on which exposure group they belong to, molding our observed effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayrıca, yıldırma korkutma veya cezalandırma amacıyla gerçekleştirilen, bireyin belirli bir süre boyunca bir veya daha fazla kişi tarafından kendini savunamayacağı olumsuz davranışlara maruz kaldığını hissettiği durumlar da zorbalığı kapsamaktadır (Einarsen, Hoel ve Notelaers, 2009). Evrensel olarak kabul edilmiş bir tanımı bulunmayan işyeri zorbalığı ise genellikle farklı güç düzeylerine sahip iki veya daha fazla taraf arasında belirli bir süre boyunca düzenli olarak tekrarlanan taciz edici, kırıcı veya sosyal olarak dışlayıcı eylemler olarak kabul edilmektedir (Neall, Li ve Tuckey, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Unfortunately, Human Resources professionals whom employees turn to for help tend to believe that bullying stems from interpersonal problems [ 7 ] and do not feel urged to act [ 8 ]. Upon formal bullying complaints, poor execution of investigations diminishes perceptions of organizational fairness and justice, triggering escalation to an outside party for further investigation [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%